Titlebook: Ordinary Relationships; A Sociological Study Julie Brownlie Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014 S

轻舟

书目名称Ordinary Relationships影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Ordinary Relationships影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Ordinary Relationships网络公开度




书目名称Ordinary Relationships网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Ordinary Relationships被引频次




书目名称Ordinary Relationships被引频次学科排名




书目名称Ordinary Relationships年度引用




书目名称Ordinary Relationships年度引用学科排名




书目名称Ordinary Relationships读者反馈




书目名称Ordinary Relationships读者反馈学科排名

dry-eye

兽皮

Living in the Second World . talking, through investigating our beliefs and practices about privacy, is an exercise which involves engaging with the related concepts of ‘the public’, the ‘personal’ (Mills, 1959) and ‘secrecy’ (Smart, 2011).

贵族

Presbyopia

Introduction: The Death of Ordinary Relationships?ent of ordinary relationships’ (1979, p.184). For Williams, ‘the principle that you can only be brought through emotional crisis by a professional’ is an ‘extraordinary characteristic notion of bourgeois-bureaucratic society’. The potential of ‘ordinary relationships’ is much debated in the current

香料

刺耳

About Distances: Researching Emotional Liveshe dialogue, to where, as he saw it, the author stopped getting in the way and the action began. As he got older, he became more interested in the things which ‘register and weigh’ (Miller, 2010, p.viii) — place, objects, memories, the mood of the moment, dimensions he felt he could best capture thr

慎重

SPURN

Look Who’s Listeninghere is a clamour to be heard, to narrate and gain attention’. Within the social sciences, though, the focus has been on talk without, curiously, much interest in who is doing the .. Most of the discussion in the last chapter focused on our general orientations towards emotions talk, that is, on our

吗啡

The Practice of Being There, doing, reflexivity, privacy and vulnerability. This chapter begins by looking at what relationships that ‘matter’ look and feel like and teasing out what we mean when we say others are ‘there’ for us. To draw on Goffman’s (1974) question, I am interested in . when we are ‘there’ for others in the