Titlebook: Ontology and Closeness in Human-Nature Relationships; Beyond Dualisms, Mat Neil H. Kessler Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 en

CURL

Campaign

Ecofeminist Dualismsg these dualisms introduce a tension between modern human closeness experiences and explanatory theories where true reciprocal closeness is defined as improbable. Human/nature dualisms such as ., ., ., and . all operate to reinforce this tension, with a. as both human/nature dualism and by-product o

我正派

Posthumanism’s Material Problemntradictions and too much uncertainty about its particular material processes. Second, the material ontology of posthumanism is predicated on an analysis of Cartesian dualism that erroneously rejects the more-than-material metaphysical category in order to move humans out of it. The correct interpre

设施

Human-Nature Relationship Modelcare, kinship and others. But, as mentioned in Chap. 2, even with this reliance upon such relational terms, modern human-nature relationship scholars build theories of closeness that are at odds with the reciprocity perceived in the closeness experience itself. Such modern theories relocate these po

Airtight

Musket

Foundations of Human-Nature Relational Ontology. Both posthumanist relationality such as Karen Barad’s, and that which is characterized by Aristotle as being inferior to primary and precedent, metaphysically isolated “substances,” should be rejected. Both position either “relations” or “substances” as primary, when both relations . substances sh

织布机

floaters

甜食

Compass