找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Once Can Be Enough; Decisive Experiments Allan Franklin,Ronald Laymon Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

[复制链接]
查看: 38956|回复: 42
发表于 2025-3-21 18:28:57 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Once Can Be Enough
副标题Decisive Experiments
编辑Allan Franklin,Ronald Laymon
视频video
概述Provides a focused analysis of the interplay between discovery and confirmation.Explores the role played by mistake, contentious disagreement, and serendipity in science.Argues that replication is not
图书封面Titlebook: Once Can Be Enough; Decisive Experiments Allan Franklin,Ronald Laymon Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl
描述.There has recently been considerable discussion of a “replication crisis” in some areas of science. In this book, the authors argue that replication is not a necessary criterion for the validation of a scientific experiment. Five episodes from physics and genetics are used to substantiate this thesis: the Meselson-Stahl experiment on DNA replication, the discoveries of the positron and the omega minus hyperon,  Mendel’s plant experiments, and the discovery of parity nonconservation. Two cases in which once wasn’t enough are also discussed, the nondiscovery of parity nonconservation and the search for magnetic monopoles. Reasons why once wasn’t enough are also discussed..
出版日期Book 2021
关键词Interaction Between Experimental and Theoretical Physics; Replication of Experimental Results; Theory
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62565-8
isbn_softcover978-3-030-62567-2
isbn_ebook978-3-030-62565-8
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Once Can Be Enough影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Once Can Be Enough影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Once Can Be Enough网络公开度




书目名称Once Can Be Enough网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Once Can Be Enough被引频次




书目名称Once Can Be Enough被引频次学科排名




书目名称Once Can Be Enough年度引用




书目名称Once Can Be Enough年度引用学科排名




书目名称Once Can Be Enough读者反馈




书目名称Once Can Be Enough读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:35:09 | 显示全部楼层
t, and serendipity in science.Argues that replication is not.There has recently been considerable discussion of a “replication crisis” in some areas of science. In this book, the authors argue that replication is not a necessary criterion for the validation of a scientific experiment. Five episodes
发表于 2025-3-22 02:35:34 | 显示全部楼层
The Discovery of the Omega Minus Hyperone experimental discovery to establish the existence of the particle to the degree that further experimental and theoretical development was clearly justified, which ultimately led to the quark model of elementary particles.
发表于 2025-3-22 08:05:44 | 显示全部楼层
The Meselson-Stahl Experiment: “the Most Beautiful Experiment in Biology”hat experiment was further refined so as to yield a more accurate result. These experiments set the stage for the creation of new competing accounts of DNA replication all of which—given the framework established by the Meselson-Stahl experiments—were eliminated by experimental tests leaving only the Watson-Crick model in play.
发表于 2025-3-22 09:38:37 | 显示全部楼层
Once Came Close to Being Enough: Electron Polarization and Parity Nonconservation β decay. The second scattering showed a left-right (90°/270°) asymmetry. At the time, no one, including the experimenters themselves, realized the significance of these results. We will discuss whether these results did, in fact, demonstrate parity nonconservation and why they were overlooked.
发表于 2025-3-22 15:55:34 | 显示全部楼层
The Search for the Magnetic Monopolegle North or South magnetic poles, something which had never been observed. Dirac’s theory also predicted the strength of such a magnetic pole. In 1982 Blas Cabrera reported an event which fit Dirac’s prediction very well. Yet Cabrera made no discovery claim nor was Dirac’s theory regarded as confirmed. The reasons for this are discussed.
发表于 2025-3-22 19:35:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:04:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:07:58 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2021is not a necessary criterion for the validation of a scientific experiment. Five episodes from physics and genetics are used to substantiate this thesis: the Meselson-Stahl experiment on DNA replication, the discoveries of the positron and the omega minus hyperon,  Mendel’s plant experiments, and th
发表于 2025-3-23 08:10:42 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-30 09:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表