Titlebook: Noun Phrases and Nominalizations; The Syntax of DPs Tal Siloni Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997 Index.Syntax.compar

饮料

Event Nominals,ishing between event nominals (also known in the literature as process or action nominals) and result nominals (sometimes concrete or simple nouns), linguists have investigated the behavior of nouns with respect to argument structure and θ-theory (Anderson 1983–84, Lebeaux 1986, Grimshaw 1990, among

Optimum

Semi-Relatives and Reduced Relatives,bardi 1994). Somewhat simplified, their insight is that D determines the referential capacity of the nominal expression, which consequently is able to act as an argument. In this respect, Szabolcsi (1987, 1989) argues, D functionss on a par with the complementizer of sentential complements: each ren

烦躁的女人

Verbal and Nominal Gerunds, a syntactic affix that has a nominalizing function and consequently subcategorizes for a VP (chapter 3). In this sense, verbs cannot change their categorial specification. Hebrew event nominals have been shown to be purely nominal, although at first glance they seem to manifest some verbal properti

阴谋

Theoretical Issues,5). This assumption suggests a way to account for the rapidity and apparent ease with which children acquire the remarkable complexities of languages, without systematic instruction, on the basis of incomplete data, and with no negative evidence.

我还要背着他

Semi-Relatives and Reduced Relatives,ders its complement (NP and IP, respectively) an expression that is able to bear a θ-role. In this chapter I discuss a novel facet of D, which supports the functional analogy between articles and complementizers: I claim that D can act as the relative complementizer of certain clausal structures.

逗留

0924-4670 ax that have not been approached with concurrent tools inrecent years. The study examines the functional structure, offers astructural definition of syntactic nominalization, and carefully drawsthe border line between the lexical nominalizing mechanism and itssyntactic counterpart. The empirical bas

ITCH

Book 1997ve not been approached with concurrent tools inrecent years. The study examines the functional structure, offers astructural definition of syntactic nominalization, and carefully drawsthe border line between the lexical nominalizing mechanism and itssyntactic counterpart. The empirical base of the s

桉树

engender

E. A. Medova,J. E. Scottl services continue to play a central partin the development of national economies. However, the economic and social roleof postal services has changed rapidly and fundamentally over the last twodecades. In most industrialized countries, paper-based communications are in seriousdecline, while the de

Arthritis