找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Norms, Naturalism and Epistemology; The Case for Science Jonathan Knowles Book 2003 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

[复制链接]
楼主: antithetic
发表于 2025-3-26 23:21:28 | 显示全部楼层
e basis of household-level data.. While there is an enormous literature on particular aspects of government expenditures and taxation, there has been no recent study of the net effect of the government budget (expenditures less taxes) on household economic well-being. The last comprehensive estimate
发表于 2025-3-27 02:08:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 08:16:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 10:44:00 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2003ms for cognitive enquiry on such a naturalistic basis. The author argues that, whilst naturalism must be embraced, this more abmitious project is in vain: to the extent one can justify naturalistic norms, they are not needed for optimal rational belief-formation.
发表于 2025-3-27 15:45:42 | 显示全部楼层
tivate norms for cognitive enquiry on such a naturalistic basis. The author argues that, whilst naturalism must be embraced, this more abmitious project is in vain: to the extent one can justify naturalistic norms, they are not needed for optimal rational belief-formation.978-1-349-50836-5978-0-230-51126-2
发表于 2025-3-27 18:13:25 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2003, assuming some beliefs and the general reliability of our basic cognitive practices to justify others. Naturalized epistemology seeks to motivate norms for cognitive enquiry on such a naturalistic basis. The author argues that, whilst naturalism must be embraced, this more abmitious project is in v
发表于 2025-3-27 23:06:30 | 显示全部楼层
Traditional Epistemology and Naturalism,be described as anything but naturalistic — to look first at how epistemology is conceived on a more traditional model. In this chapter, I will present the outlines of what I call TE before showing how this, arguably, breaks down, paving the way for naturalism and NE.
发表于 2025-3-28 04:54:45 | 显示全部楼层
Anti-psychologism,definitive theory of epistemic norms that might function as a kind of foundation for science (in a weak sense), but that these norms do not merely detail the structure of a cognitive reasoning competence.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 09:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表