找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Normative Plurality in International Law; A Theory of the Dete Carlos Iván Fuentes Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

[复制链接]
查看: 6657|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 17:55:44 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Normative Plurality in International Law
副标题A Theory of the Dete
编辑Carlos Iván Fuentes
视频video
概述Is the first to comprehensively analyze the practice of human rights courts in applying legal instruments outside their competence.Provides a theoretical framework for explaining the choices made by i
丛书名称Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
图书封面Titlebook: Normative Plurality in International Law; A Theory of the Dete Carlos Iván Fuentes Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
描述.This book provides a theoretical framework for explaining the choices made by international decision-makers in terms of what constitutes law. It comprehensively analyzes the practice of human rights courts in applying legal instruments outside their competence and proposes that this practice recognizes that different normative instruments coexist in an un-ordered space, and that meaning can be produced by the free interaction of those instruments around a problem. Based on this, the book advances its normative plurality hypothesis, which states that decision-makers must survey the acquis of international law in order to identify all the instruments containing relevant normative information for a particular situation. The set of rules of law applicable to the situation must then be complemented with other instruments containing specific normative information relevant to the situation, resulting in a complete system of norms advancing a common purpose..
出版日期Book 2016
关键词Domestic Violence; Forced Disappearances; Forced Displacement; Human Rights in Times of War; Human Right
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43929-7
isbn_softcover978-3-319-82944-9
isbn_ebook978-3-319-43929-7Series ISSN 1534-6781 Series E-ISSN 2214-9902
issn_series 1534-6781
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Normative Plurality in International Law影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Normative Plurality in International Law影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Normative Plurality in International Law网络公开度




书目名称Normative Plurality in International Law网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Normative Plurality in International Law被引频次




书目名称Normative Plurality in International Law被引频次学科排名




书目名称Normative Plurality in International Law年度引用




书目名称Normative Plurality in International Law年度引用学科排名




书目名称Normative Plurality in International Law读者反馈




书目名称Normative Plurality in International Law读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:49:17 | 显示全部楼层
1534-6781 a theoretical framework for explaining the choices made by i.This book provides a theoretical framework for explaining the choices made by international decision-makers in terms of what constitutes law. It comprehensively analyzes the practice of human rights courts in applying legal instruments out
发表于 2025-3-22 01:45:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:10:02 | 显示全部楼层
The Imperfect Paradigm: Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice,cases in which the ICJ, when confronted with normative forms which do not conform to the requirements of the doctrine of sources as elaborated by its own jurisprudence, treated them as belonging to one of the categories mentioned in Article 38.
发表于 2025-3-22 12:29:54 | 显示全部楼层
General Conclusion,ad of trying to explain issues of grand design, focuses more on the answerable questions. I also reaffirm the central focus of the normative plurality hypothesis: modern theory must take into account the psychological process by which the judge arrives at his decision.
发表于 2025-3-22 16:05:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:03:49 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2016rehensively analyzes the practice of human rights courts in applying legal instruments outside their competence and proposes that this practice recognizes that different normative instruments coexist in an un-ordered space, and that meaning can be produced by the free interaction of those instrument
发表于 2025-3-22 22:40:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:50:18 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43929-7Domestic Violence; Forced Disappearances; Forced Displacement; Human Rights in Times of War; Human Right
发表于 2025-3-23 06:07:49 | 显示全部楼层
Carlos Iván FuentesIs the first to comprehensively analyze the practice of human rights courts in applying legal instruments outside their competence.Provides a theoretical framework for explaining the choices made by i
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 04:50
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表