找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights; Controversy and Anal Mark Cowling Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

[复制链接]
查看: 13750|回复: 49
发表于 2025-3-21 16:28:02 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights
副标题Controversy and Anal
编辑Mark Cowling
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/669/668081/668081.mp4
概述Provides the first single-authored study of Norman Geras.Considers all aspects of Geras‘s views and positions them among wider political thought.Written by a leading scholar on Marxism
图书封面Titlebook: Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights; Controversy and Anal Mark Cowling Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an
描述This book provides a critical account of the main controversies involving Norman Geras, one of the key modern political thinkers. It moves from his youthful Trotskyism on to his book on Rosa Luxemburg, then his classic account of Marx and human nature, and his highly regarded discussion of Marx and justice. Following this, Geras tried to elaborate a Marxist theory of justice, which involved taking on-board aspects of liberalism. Next he attacked the post modernism of Laclau and Mouffe and criticised Rorty’s pragmatism, and then elaborated a contract of mutual indifference from a detailed study of the Holocaust. Lastly he wrote a book on human rights and humanitarian intervention, defending the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Cowling varies from exposition and admiration, to ideas about how Geras’s work should be interpreted, to criticism of his Trotskyism and of his support for the invasion of Iraq. The book will appeal to readers interested in Norman Geras and Marxism in particular, and socialand political theory in general..
出版日期Book 2018
关键词Norman Geras; contemporary political theory; Rosa Luxemburg; modern political thinkers; Geras and Trotsk
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74048-5
isbn_softcover978-3-030-08906-1
isbn_ebook978-3-319-74048-5
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights网络公开度




书目名称Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights被引频次




书目名称Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights被引频次学科排名




书目名称Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights年度引用




书目名称Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights年度引用学科排名




书目名称Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights读者反馈




书目名称Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:29:16 | 显示全部楼层
Geras and Postmodernism 2: Richard Rorty,d that Geras could have used the work of Paolo Freire to criticize him. Most importantly, Cowling argues that Geras’s critique of Rorty’s pragmatism could have been strengthened by a discussion of Rorty’s book ., together with criticisms made of it by philosophers of mind.
发表于 2025-3-22 00:41:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:38:03 | 显示全部楼层
Geras and Postmodernism 1: Laclau and Mouffe, attempt to vindicate the idea of relative autonomy. He agrees with Geras’s reply to Laclau and Mouffe’s riposte to him, but argues that, though his accusations that they are idealist are valid, he could benefit from greater philosophical sophistication, and the issue is discussed in more depth in Chap. ..
发表于 2025-3-22 11:17:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:39:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:03:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:55:12 | 显示全部楼层
Crimes Against Humanity,gives a lengthy and compelling series of reasons why the marchers against the war were right not to trust the US-led invasion. Marxism involves a serious attempt to analyse the nature of societies, and on this issue, at least, Geras seems to have abrogated this in favour of making liberal moral judgements.
发表于 2025-3-23 02:27:27 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion,here in Europe, nor in the possible merits of Chinese Communism as an engine of poverty reduction. Finally, in the light of Geras’s critique of Marx’s economics, there is the issue of to what extent Geras remained a Marxist as opposed to a liberal influenced by some Marxist ideas.
发表于 2025-3-23 07:40:02 | 显示全部楼层
The Enlightenment and Modernity,o emphasize the darker side of Enlightenment values, found in the panopticon, colonialism and patriarchy. The collection is an excellent critique of this popular set of views, emphasizing the oversimplifications of Foucault and the diversity of Enlightenment thinking.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-26 03:32
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表