找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Non-Standard Employment in Europe; Paradigms, Prevalenc Max Koch,Martin Fritz Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publish

[复制链接]
查看: 33099|回复: 50
发表于 2025-3-21 16:54:20 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Non-Standard Employment in Europe
副标题Paradigms, Prevalenc
编辑Max Koch,Martin Fritz
视频video
丛书名称Work and Welfare in Europe
图书封面Titlebook: Non-Standard Employment in Europe; Paradigms, Prevalenc Max Koch,Martin Fritz Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publish
描述Postwar employment standards are being undermined and ‘non-standard‘ employment is becoming more common. While scholars have pointed to negative consequences of this development, this volume also discusses the evidence for a new and socially inclusive European employment standard.
出版日期Book 2013
关键词care; Comparative analysis; Enlarged European Union; European Union; European Union (EU); labor market; Ma
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137267160
isbn_softcover978-1-349-44331-4
isbn_ebook978-1-137-26716-0Series ISSN 2947-4124 Series E-ISSN 2947-4132
issn_series 2947-4124
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Non-Standard Employment in Europe影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Non-Standard Employment in Europe影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Non-Standard Employment in Europe网络公开度




书目名称Non-Standard Employment in Europe网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Non-Standard Employment in Europe被引频次




书目名称Non-Standard Employment in Europe被引频次学科排名




书目名称Non-Standard Employment in Europe年度引用




书目名称Non-Standard Employment in Europe年度引用学科排名




书目名称Non-Standard Employment in Europe读者反馈




书目名称Non-Standard Employment in Europe读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:19:47 | 显示全部楼层
A Conceptual Approach of the Destandardization of Employment in Europe since the 1970sf a variety of concepts. Initial important insights can be related to the literature on labour market segmentation of the 1970s and later, to the literature on flexibility of work and of employment. Sociology and institutional economics remained the main disciplinary location for this analysis and t
发表于 2025-3-22 03:09:35 | 显示全部楼层
Employment Standards in Transition: From Fordism to Finance-Driven Capitalismdition of flexibility and diversity and define their scope. Chaos and disintegration both at the system and social level (Lockwood, 1992) would be the likely result without such agreements on social standards.
发表于 2025-3-22 04:56:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:23:51 | 显示全部楼层
The Expansion of Temporary Employment in Spain (1984–2010): Neither Socially Fair nor Economically Pndard work arrangements and the extent of their use varied notably in different national contexts and were influenced by far from linear trajectories of socio-economic development, which we understand as the results of social struggles in each one of these societies (Crouch, 1993; Ferner and Hyman,
发表于 2025-3-22 15:46:15 | 显示全部楼层
‘Flexicurity’ through Normalization? Changes in Scope, Composition and Conditions of Temporary Emplosen and Regini, 2000). There is, however, little evidence that flexibilization has had much impact on employment rates (Kahn, 2010; Boeri and Garibaldi, 2007) in these countries. In contrast, increasing numbers of workers became trapped in low-quality jobs with little employment security (Barbieri a
发表于 2025-3-22 17:36:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:53:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:43:42 | 显示全部楼层
Revival of the ‘German Model’? Destandardization and the New Labour Market Regimeard during this time, German firms successfully asserted their market shares by focusing on product quality and innovation. The German employment model, characterized by stable and long-term employment, institutionalized codetermination, comprehensive vocational training and low wage dispersion, pro
发表于 2025-3-23 08:49:25 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 23:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表