Titlebook: New World Order and Small Regions; The Case of South Ca Emil Avdaliani Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exc

AMASS

书目名称New World Order and Small Regions影响因子(影响力)




书目名称New World Order and Small Regions影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称New World Order and Small Regions网络公开度




书目名称New World Order and Small Regions网络公开度学科排名




书目名称New World Order and Small Regions被引频次




书目名称New World Order and Small Regions被引频次学科排名




书目名称New World Order and Small Regions年度引用




书目名称New World Order and Small Regions年度引用学科排名




书目名称New World Order and Small Regions读者反馈




书目名称New World Order and Small Regions读者反馈学科排名

Bother

,Turkey’s Evolving Approach to the Black Sea and the South Caucasus Region,eepening geopolitical engagement through the prism of a realist Eurasianism. Unlike the classical Russian Eurasianism and its later variations, Turkey’s approach is highly pragmatic that seeks the spaces and conflicts it can tap into to increase its regional outreach.

怪物

Introduction,he highly fluid present world order. As the world, despite the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and numerous other crises, has nevertheless maintained an unprecedented level of economic and political interconnectedness, no story of the South Caucasus could be related without contextualizing larger developments taking place in the world.

Afflict

inhibit

al discourses of regional powers – Russia, Turkey and Iran.AThe book provides a comprehensive understanding of the unfolding geopolitical changes in the South Caucasus in the age of increased great power competition across Eurasia. Recent research on the geopolitics of the South Caucasus focuses eit

unstable-angina

IST

谷类

From Central Asia to the Black Sea: China and the South Caucasus,its role economically and politically, but it has not yet reached the desired level. This “Cauc-Asian” perspective explains the Chinese reticence in the South Caucasus. Engagement with the latter is likely to move beyond patchy investments and reach a new level once infrastructure in Central Asia and trans-Caspian connectivity improves.

Dysarthria

,Russia’s “Return” to the South Caucasus,argued that Moscow’s heavy reliance on the military component in formulating its foreign policy toward the South Caucasus cuts at Russia’s prestige, without which it will be difficult to maintain a long-term hegemony based on consent and willingness from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia.

POLYP