找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences; Some Moral Implicati William B. Bondeson,H. Tristram Engelhardt,Joseph Book 19821st edition D. R

[复制链接]
查看: 34125|回复: 52
发表于 2025-3-21 19:09:06 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences
副标题Some Moral Implicati
编辑William B. Bondeson,H. Tristram Engelhardt,Joseph
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences; Some Moral Implicati William B. Bondeson,H. Tristram Engelhardt,Joseph  Book 19821st edition D. R
描述The spectacular development of medical knowledge over the last two centuries has brought intrusive advances in the capabilities of medical technology. These advances have been remarkable over the last century, but especially over the last few decades, culminating in such high technology interventions as heart transplants and renal dialysis. These increases in medical powers have attracted societal interest in acquiring more such knowledge. They have also spawned concerns regarding the use of human subjects in research and regarding the byproducts of basic research as in the recent recombinant DNA debate. As a consequence of the development of new biomedical knowledge, physicians and biomedical scientists have been placed in positions of new power and responsibility. The emergence of this group of powerful and knowledgeable experts has occasioned debates regarding the accountability of physicians and biomedical scientists. But beyond that, the very investment of resources in the acquisition of new knowledge has been questioned. Societies must decide whether finite resources would not be better invested at this juncture, or in general, in the alleviation of the problems of hunger or
出版日期Book 19821st edition
关键词Biomedical ethics; Medical Ethics; ethical theory; ethics; health; morality
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7723-5
isbn_softcover978-94-009-7725-9
isbn_ebook978-94-009-7723-5
copyrightD. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1982
The information of publication is updating

书目名称New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences影响因子(影响力)




书目名称New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences网络公开度




书目名称New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences网络公开度学科排名




书目名称New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences被引频次




书目名称New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences被引频次学科排名




书目名称New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences年度引用




书目名称New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences年度引用学科排名




书目名称New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences读者反馈




书目名称New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:56:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:31:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:37:29 | 显示全部楼层
The Physician as Moral ArbiterWhen asked to comment about the physician as moral arbiter, I thought it useful to begin by considering just what a moral arbiter would be. To speak of someone as a moral arbiter, or to speak of some group as functioning in that role, is to say that there is arbitration and that it concerns moral matters.
发表于 2025-3-22 10:15:30 | 显示全部楼层
Only the Best is Good Enough?Nicholas Reseller’s argument is wonderfully direct and important. Moreover, he raises exceedingly grave moral questions, questions which are simply “ungetaroundable”, to use C. I. Lewis’s plain term for what is insistently present.
发表于 2025-3-22 14:02:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:13:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 21:42:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:38:28 | 显示全部楼层
Rights and Responsibilities in Medical Sciencepolicy would do well to start in the midst of policy problems” ([1], p. 60). I will paraphrase that, and say, “philosophers, lawyers and legislators interested in medical problems and the application of medical research, would do well to start in the midst of clinical problems by participating in th
发表于 2025-3-23 08:12:09 | 显示全部楼层
Book 19821st editionysicians and biomedical scientists. But beyond that, the very investment of resources in the acquisition of new knowledge has been questioned. Societies must decide whether finite resources would not be better invested at this juncture, or in general, in the alleviation of the problems of hunger or
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-17 21:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表