找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia; Michael Cholbi,Jukka Varelius Book 20151st edition Springer International

[复制链接]
查看: 43286|回复: 51
发表于 2025-3-21 18:50:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
编辑Michael Cholbi,Jukka Varelius
视频video
概述Examines the implications of nascent ethical, social, and technological developments on the justification of physician assisted suicide (PAS) and voluntary euthanasia (VE).Alters significantly the con
丛书名称International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine
图书封面Titlebook: New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia;  Michael Cholbi,Jukka Varelius Book 20151st edition Springer International
描述.This book provides novel perspectives on the ethical justifiability of assisted dying. Seeking to go beyond traditional debates on topics such as the value of human life and questions surrounding intention and causation, this volume promises to shift the terrain of the ethical debates about assisted dying. It reconsiders the role of patient autonomy and paternalistic reasons as well as the part proposed for medical professionals and clinical ethics consultation in connection with assisted dying, relates the debate on assisted dying to questions about organ-donation and developments in medical technology, and demonstrates the significance of experimental philosophy in assessing questions of assisted dying. This book is ideal for advanced courses in bioethics and health care ethics..
出版日期Book 20151st edition
关键词Ethics of Assisted Suicide; Ethics of Euthanasia; Health Care Policy; Physician-assisted suicide; Volunt
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22050-5
isbn_softcover978-3-319-37145-0
isbn_ebook978-3-319-22050-5Series ISSN 1567-8008 Series E-ISSN 2351-955X
issn_series 1567-8008
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
The information of publication is updating

书目名称New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia影响因子(影响力)




书目名称New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia网络公开度




书目名称New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia网络公开度学科排名




书目名称New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia被引频次




书目名称New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia被引频次学科排名




书目名称New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia年度引用




书目名称New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia年度引用学科排名




书目名称New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia读者反馈




书目名称New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:30:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:23:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:20:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:56:55 | 显示全部楼层
Preventing Assistance to Die: Assessing Indirect Paternalism Regarding Voluntary Active Euthanasia n. These aspects are not deemed decisive when considering the case of indirect paternalistic intervention. Finally, I argue against the rationale of indirect paternalism by showing that there are at least two situations where it does not succeed. One such situation that undermines the justification
发表于 2025-3-22 16:57:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 21:01:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:13:57 | 显示全部楼层
Clinical Ethics Consultation and Physician Assisted Suicide,hey should respond in such cases. The ethicist may only recommend—or assist others to reach—solutions to moral disagreements falling within the limits of established norms. Since the normative landscape of PAS appears to be changing, whether it falls within these limits is unsettled. I conclude that
发表于 2025-3-23 02:41:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:26:42 | 显示全部楼层
Implanted Medical Devices and End-of-Life Decisions, does not constitute a reason for physicians not to participate in deactivation. I also argue that an understanding of why it is acceptable for physicians to participate in deactivation reveals why physician-assisted death is morally acceptable in certain kinds of cases.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-12 15:13
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表