Titlebook: Neutrality and Theory of Law; Jordi Ferrer Beltrán,José Juan Moreso,Diego M. Pap Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Devastate

Jordi Ferrer Beltrán,José Juan Moreso,Diego M. PapProvides the most up-to-date views on methodological and substantive issues from some of the most important legal philosophers in the Anglo-American and European scholarship.Offers a sophisticated, ye

HAIL

The Architecture of Jurisprudence,ature fields, however, the conventional wisdom can sometimes be misleading and the central problems poorly cast. Unfortunately, this is the state of affairs in analytic jurisprudence. Progress can be made only if much of the conventional wisdom is displaced and its central questions are reframed.

lobster

fiction

Normative Legal Positivism, Neutrality, and the Rule of Law,econd stems from the ‘inherent neutrality’ of prescriptions. Under both respects, it turns out, in J. Raz’s words, “observance of the rule of law is necessary if the law is to respect human dignity”..Normative legal positivism, Rule of Law, Neutrality, prescriptions, certainty

ectropion

Jurisprudential Methodology: Is Pure Interpretation Possible?,of a practice ought only to meet certain meta-theoretical standards such as clarity, consistency, coherence and comprehensiveness. While recogning that some of these values could be accepted by moralistic philosophers, he argues that a pure theorist should be concerned with them alone.

Volatile-Oils

1572-4395 American and European scholarship.Offers a sophisticated, ye.This book brings together twelve of the most important legal philosophers in the Anglo-American and Civil Law traditions. The book is a collection of the papers these philosophers presented at the Conference on Neutrality and Theory of Law

圣人

Alexy Between Positivism and Non-positivism,s advanced by Alexy: the argument of the applicability of Radbruch’s formula and the argument of the claim to correctness, both in their close relation to the distinction between the observer’s and the participant’s perspectives of legal practice.

装饰

The Scientific Model of Jurisprudence,l potential objections to my argument. If my argument is correct, this shows that jurisprudential descriptivism is not just, as some have argued, unimportant, but rather that it is impossible. The paper suggests that those who claim to offer an account of the “nature” of law are in fact doing something else.

容易生皱纹

Between Positivism and Non-positivism? A Third Reply to Eugenio Bulygin,ant as well as the implications of this distinction for the thesis of a necessary connection between law and morality, third, the concept of morality to which the connection thesis refers, and, fourth, the question of whether the debate between positivism and non-positivism concerns more than merely verbal issues.

小争吵