Titlebook: Neurofeminism; Issues at the Inters Robyn Bluhm (Assistant Professor of Philosophy),An Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmilla

使服水土

methods established during his decades of research and practice, covering topics such as difference between the spatial resolution of pixel and the resolution of traditional film, the resolution of remote sensing image for characteristics and target recognition purpose, and image shift problem of s

老巫婆

Introduction,demic disciplines, and the essays often include insights and material from more than one area of study. The work can be seen as addressing issues in four large areas within neurofeminism: sex and gender differences, ethics, philosophy of science, and embodiment. Many of the essays address topics fro

灯丝

covert

duplicate

In a Different Voice?, seem to think so, be they researchers or lay people, men or women. However, the evidence from psychology and neuroscience does not support this conclusion. Matching the cognitive and emotional traits most obviously related to caring, we find few, if any, differences between male and female capaciti

虚情假意

,The Role of Fetal Testosterone in the Development of the “Essential Difference” Between the Sexes: tive, and behavioral differences between the sexes; and second, to explain the pattern of symptoms associated with autistic syndromes. These two goals are connected, since Baron-Cohen argues that autism is the expression of an “extreme male brain” (e.g. Baron-Cohen 2002). Briefly, the E/S hypothesis

雄辩

Hardwired for Sexism? Approaches to Sex/Gender in Neuroscience,tion, and institutions, including the research questions and methods used in science (Fausto-Sterling 2000b; Risman 2004; Ridgeway 2009). Neuroscientists, on the other hand, typically approach gender as a status or a collection of characteristics that male versus female people (and sometimes other a

GEAR

Situated Neuroscience: Exploring Biologies of Diversity,t science? (Richardson 2008). Early feminist approaches to science were concerned with certain assumptions within scientific methodology itself. During that period, there were exhortations for a replacement of androcentric values with feminist values (Harding 1991) and a replacing of the Kuhnian val

BAIL

Annotate

,Linking Neuroscience, Medicine, Gender and Society through Controversy and Conflict Analysis: A “Din. I suggest we work with what I call a ‘dissensus framework,’ i.e. a critical framework centered on the study of conflicts and controversies, including their absence, unsuccessful controversies, etc. I explore how we could work with a dissensus framework, taking as an illustration the controversial