Titlebook: NATO, Britain, France and the FRG; Nuclear Strategies a Beatrice Heuser Book 1997 Beatrice Heuser 1997 Europe.Germany.NATO

实体

书目名称NATO, Britain, France and the FRG影响因子(影响力)




书目名称NATO, Britain, France and the FRG影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称NATO, Britain, France and the FRG网络公开度




书目名称NATO, Britain, France and the FRG网络公开度学科排名




书目名称NATO, Britain, France and the FRG被引频次




书目名称NATO, Britain, France and the FRG被引频次学科排名




书目名称NATO, Britain, France and the FRG年度引用




书目名称NATO, Britain, France and the FRG年度引用学科排名




书目名称NATO, Britain, France and the FRG读者反馈




书目名称NATO, Britain, France and the FRG读者反馈学科排名

omnibus

affinity

污点

杀菌剂

The Federal Republic of Germany: Consultation,ists and missile engineers were exported in droves, the Federal Republic inherited enough know-how to continue the research programme of the Third Reich. However, it lacked access to the necessary raw materials to develop a full-fledged nuclear programme of its own, quite apart from the determination of the Occupying Powers to prevent this..

neutrophils

Projects for a European Nuclear Force, development of nuclear weapons or missiles. Some had as a background the ideal of a genuinely jointly owned and commanded European nuclear force, presupposing an integrated European political decision-making system. Some aimed at least at creating common consultation fora, similar to the NPG or the NAC.

Obsequious

Book 1997West Germany), this book shows how strategies were functions of a perceived Soviet threat and an American ‘nuclear guarantee‘. There were three options for West Europeans: a compromise with differing American needs in NATO, pursued by Britain and the FRG; national nuclear forces, developed by Britai

思想灵活

RACE

homocysteine

French Strategy: Independence,ion of two weapons-grade piles of plutonium.. This later gave France the option of developing military applications.. Yet until 1954, the French nuclear programme was still general enough to be directed towards both civilian and military applications.