找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences; Festschrift for Pete Samuel Salzborn,Eldad Davidov,Jost Reinecke Book

[复制链接]
楼主: hedonist
发表于 2025-3-28 15:02:52 | 显示全部楼层
The Application of the Reasoned Action Approach to Survey Nonresponseeducing nonresponse bias (Cycyota and Harrison, 2006; Groves and Peytcheva, 2008). Since refusal rate is an aggregated measure of individuals’ nonresponse behavior, it seems that a general motivational theory for explaining the psychological process involved in the individual decision to refuse, is needed.
发表于 2025-3-28 20:39:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 01:44:36 | 显示全部楼层
Faked Interviewscontrol mechanism recommended by AAPOR (2003) and other national institutes on public opinion research, one may come to the conclusion that interview falsification is not an important problem in empirical research.
发表于 2025-3-29 03:40:51 | 显示全部楼层
The Empirical Study of Ethical Issues in Survey Participationnot only for the elegance of his research, which applies sophisticated methodology to a wide variety of sociological problems, but also for his personal and professional integrity and his warmth as a human being.
发表于 2025-3-29 07:56:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 14:33:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 16:27:16 | 显示全部楼层
Politics, evidence, treatment, evaluation, responsibility – The models PETER and PETER-Smodel of evidence based policies: PETER – a model of mutual influences and dependencies of Politics, Evidence, Treatment, Evaluation, and Responsibility. The chapter ends with a sketch on the needed competencies to make the model work – the model PETER-S.
发表于 2025-3-29 23:33:51 | 显示全部楼层
The Research Program of the Rational Choice Approach: A Reconstructionplying and extending the approach, it is still not clear what its central assumptions are and what arguments contemporary rational choice scholars adduce that speak in favor or against it. The present paper addresses these questions.
发表于 2025-3-30 00:56:06 | 显示全部楼层
Critique as Premise. Reflections on methodological commonalities between critical rationalism and cr of the German Society for Sociology, which became known in social science history as the. or "positivism dispute" (cf. Adorno et al., 1969), and which reinforced the image of two scholarly philosophies diametrically opposed on theoretical-methodological grounds.
发表于 2025-3-30 06:31:14 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-17 12:15
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表