找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Methods of Legal Reasoning; Jerzy Stelmach,Bartosz Brozek Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Epistemology.Linguistic Anal

[复制链接]
查看: 31567|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 17:01:23 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning
编辑Jerzy Stelmach,Bartosz Brozek
视频video
概述The only book that covers four major philosophies of legal reasoning (logic, analysis, argumentation, hermeneutics).Shows the philosophical basis for any theory of legal reasoning.Reports interdiscipl
丛书名称Law and Philosophy Library
图书封面Titlebook: Methods of Legal Reasoning;  Jerzy Stelmach,Bartosz Brozek Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Epistemology.Linguistic Anal
描述Anyone reflecting on the methodology of legal reasoning faces a difficult task. The number of methodological theories in jurisprudence and the vast literature on the subject are not the only problems that have to be taken into account. Perhaps the most striking difficulty concerning the methodology of legal argument is the heated debate between jurists, legal theorists and philosophers of law that has been recurring since at least nineteenth century. Therefore a justification is needed for writing yet another book c- cerning the methods of legal reasoning; a book that aims to cover a lot of what has already been proposed in legal theory. We believe that there is such a justification. First, the perspective that we adopt in the present book is unique, at least in some respects. We venture to look at the methodology of legal reasoning “from the outside”, i.e. from a more g- eral, philosophical perspective, while taking into account the “hard re- ity” of law. This perspective enables us to ask questions about the justification for the methods of legal argument presented. Second, we do not want to defend one, paradigmatic conception of legal reasoning. On the contrary, we put forward t
出版日期Book 2006
关键词Epistemology; Linguistic Analysis; analysis; argue; argumentation theories; dogmatics; hermeneutics; legal
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4939-0
isbn_softcover978-1-4020-4936-1
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-4939-2Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning网络公开度




书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning被引频次




书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning被引频次学科排名




书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning年度引用




书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning年度引用学科排名




书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning读者反馈




书目名称Methods of Legal Reasoning读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:34:38 | 显示全部楼层
Methods of Legal Reasoning978-1-4020-4939-2Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
发表于 2025-3-22 03:45:17 | 显示全部楼层
Jerzy Stelmach,Bartosz BrozekThe only book that covers four major philosophies of legal reasoning (logic, analysis, argumentation, hermeneutics).Shows the philosophical basis for any theory of legal reasoning.Reports interdiscipl
发表于 2025-3-22 06:38:51 | 显示全部楼层
Law and Philosophy Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/632431.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 09:26:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:34:11 | 显示全部楼层
Controversy over Legal Method in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries,
发表于 2025-3-22 18:59:49 | 显示全部楼层
Methods of Legal Reasoning from a Postmodern Perspective,
发表于 2025-3-23 01:14:36 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2006ical perspective, while taking into account the “hard re- ity” of law. This perspective enables us to ask questions about the justification for the methods of legal argument presented. Second, we do not want to defend one, paradigmatic conception of legal reasoning. On the contrary, we put forward t
发表于 2025-3-23 01:26:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:50:11 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-16 06:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表