Titlebook: Methodology, Metaphysics and the History of Science; In Memory of Benjami Robert S. Cohen,Marx W. Wartofsky Book 1984 D. Reidel Publishing

Throttle

sigmoid-colon

Philosophy of Science 2001,een in perspective. One must not take them too seriously. One must read them like fairy tales which have lots of interesting things to say but which may also contain sizeable errors and wicked lies. Even when acting in accordance with a certain point of view, one’s attitude should be that of an unde

alabaster

Confound

诱惑

Philosophy of Science and the Origin of Life,ind was young the embryological paradigm was used to explain the birth of the universe. “In the beginning time created the silver egg of the cosmos. Out of this egg burst Phanes-Dionysus. For the Orphics he was the first god to appear, the first born, whence he early became known as Protogonos. He w

Chandelier

Sociobiology, Anti-Sociobiology, Epistemology, and Human Nature,us biological and social sciences. It has elicited equally ebullient critical attack for its immeasurable failure to understand human cultural and social organization, a failure based on a biologically and socioculturally misconceived human nature, as well as on some basic misconceptions in biology

Abjure

抱狗不敢前

想象

,Does Popper’s Conventionalism Contradict His Critical Rationalism? Objections Against Popper in Ger his methodology of science. The critics mean that Popper, in these features, breaks his own principles of critical rationality. They accuse him of an ‘uncritical dogmatism’ and a ‘blind decisionism’, which is held to be all the more dangerous as it remains hidden under the mask of the claim that ph

烦躁的女人