找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Mental Retardation and Sterilization; A Problem of Compete Ruth Macklin,Willard Gaylin Book 1981 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1

[复制链接]
查看: 51692|回复: 51
发表于 2025-3-21 16:18:10 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Mental Retardation and Sterilization
副标题A Problem of Compete
编辑Ruth Macklin,Willard Gaylin
视频video
丛书名称The Hastings Center Series in Ethics
图书封面Titlebook: Mental Retardation and Sterilization; A Problem of Compete Ruth Macklin,Willard Gaylin Book 1981 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1
描述1 This book is the product of a one-year project conducted by the Hastings Center, Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences, during 1976-1977. The Behavior Control Research Group-an ongoing, interdisciplinary working group com­ posed of philosophers, psychiatrists, psychologists, social sci­ entists, and lawyers-met four times over the course of the year with special consultants with expertise in the field of mental retardation. At those meetings, participants gave in­ formal presentations, which were followed by group discus­ sion. As the project progressed, formal papers were delivered and subjected to further critical commentary. This volume, in two related parts, represents the deliberations of the group as a whole, and then offers individual papers prepared by some scholars in order to give a sense of the kind of specific arguments on which the general conclusions were based. We undertook the project to examine: (1) questions of competence and consent; and (2) the practical implications, lThe project, entitled "Ethical Issues in the Care and Treatment of the Mildly Mentally Retarded," was supported by the EVI5T program of the National Science Foundation under Grant N
出版日期Book 1981
关键词care; ethical issues; ethics; research; treatment
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3923-6
isbn_softcover978-1-4684-3925-0
isbn_ebook978-1-4684-3923-6
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media New York 1981
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Mental Retardation and Sterilization影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Mental Retardation and Sterilization影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Mental Retardation and Sterilization网络公开度




书目名称Mental Retardation and Sterilization网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Mental Retardation and Sterilization被引频次




书目名称Mental Retardation and Sterilization被引频次学科排名




书目名称Mental Retardation and Sterilization年度引用




书目名称Mental Retardation and Sterilization年度引用学科排名




书目名称Mental Retardation and Sterilization读者反馈




书目名称Mental Retardation and Sterilization读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:44:05 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3923-6care; ethical issues; ethics; research; treatment
发表于 2025-3-22 04:06:42 | 显示全部楼层
Toward a Definition of Mental Retardationhin a particular culture.. But whether retarded individuals were ignored, ridiculed, incarcerated, cast out, or looked upon with beneficence, attempts to comprehend and define the phenomena of retardation were few and far between until fairly recent times.
发表于 2025-3-22 04:56:59 | 显示全部楼层
Voluntary Sterilization A Viable Alternative?ciding to be sterilized, the individual must make that decision freely if it is to be considered voluntary. But since sterilization is something that is ., the individual must not only freely decide that he or she wishes it to be done, but also, in legal terms, give his or her . that it be done.
发表于 2025-3-22 09:35:14 | 显示全部楼层
Distinguishing Mentally Retarded Persons from Nonretardede aggregate they can be counted as deficits. These deficits make mildly retarded persons far more likely than nonretarded persons to be subject to exploitation, to be denied needed services, and to make errors of judgment that will have adverse consequences for themselves and others.
发表于 2025-3-22 16:11:17 | 显示全部楼层
Voluntary and Involuntary Sterilizationeugenic-sterilization statute in 1907. However, the practice did not become widespread until the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of such statutes in 1927. The Court held that a Virginia statute did not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’s often-quoted words:
发表于 2025-3-22 20:44:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:12:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:26:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:31:13 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 19:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表