Titlebook: Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918; Heather Ellis Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Natural scienc

万圣节

书目名称Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918网络公开度




书目名称Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918被引频次




书目名称Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918被引频次学科排名




书目名称Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918年度引用




书目名称Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918年度引用学科排名




书目名称Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918读者反馈




书目名称Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918读者反馈学科排名

Pruritus

纵欲

,The Changing Public Image of the ‘Man of Science’, 1600–1830,cal history of masculine reason’.. Since the early 1980s, there has been much brilliant work by feminist and women’s historians seeking to recapture the forgotten role of women in science and to expose the construction of artificial narratives of female inferiority.. Although the . of science themse

记忆法

The Decline of the British Association? Marginalization, Masculinity and Marconi,ley wrote, ‘the whole choir of cosmical sciences have acquired a soundness, severity, and fullness, which render them … as valuable to a manly mind as Mathematics and Metaphysics.’. Likewise, David Brewster, in an article for the ., written to celebrate twenty years of the BAAS, argued that the peac

钉牢

Book 2017 of the naturalphilosopher with the reclusive scholar, to early nineteenth-century attemptsto reinvent the scientist as a fashionable gentleman, to his subsequentreimagining as the epitome of Victorian moral earnestness and meritocracy,Heather Ellis analyzes the complex and changing public image of

magenta

Book 2017n. Focusing onthe British Association for the Advancement of Science, founded in 1831, itexplores the complex and dynamic shifts in the public image of the British‘man of science’ and questions thestatus of the natural scientist as a modern masculine hero. Until now, sciencehas been examined by cult

miscreant

New Masculine Heroes: Davy, Bacon and the Construction of the Gentleman-Scientist,nsformation’ in the development of the identity of the male scientist. Stressing in particular, the influence of Romanticism, Golinski writes that, ‘[t]he years around the turn of the nineteenth century brought to prominence models of male creativity that stressed imagination and the emotions, rather than classical rationality’..

instill

Thomas Carlyle, the X-Club and the Hero as Man of Science,tation of the character and career of the chief historical hero of the British Association—Francis Bacon himself. To emphasize his status as a celibate monk (a fact the BAAS certainly avoided), Bowden referred to him as ‘Friar Bacon’ and described his life as a ‘solitary student, wasting the midnight oil in his cloister’..

商店街

Reuniting Theory and Practice: The Man of Science and the First World War,cal research’. In the popular press, this distinction, as we have seen, placed them squarely in the space of the laboratory away from the world. Thus, more so arguably than in the early days of the Association, the man of science was equated with the figure of the isolated scholar.

Crumple

2730-9479 mage of the British ‘man of science‘.Analyses the constructi.This bookoffers the first in-depth study of the masculine self-fashioning of scientificpractitioners in nineteenth and early twentieth-century Britain. Focusing onthe British Association for the Advancement of Science, founded in 1831, ite