找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought; Belinda Roberts Peters Book 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pu

[复制链接]
查看: 47707|回复: 48
发表于 2025-3-21 18:09:10 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought
编辑Belinda Roberts Peters
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought;  Belinda Roberts Peters Book 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pu
描述This study traces the decline of marriage as a metaphor for political authority, subjection, and tyranny in Seventeenth-century political thought. An image that bound consent and contract with divine right absolutism, and irrevocably connected royal prerogatives with subjects‘ liberties, its disappearance in the middle decades of the century coincided with the full emergence of patriarchalist and social contract theories. If both these accepted the importance of ‘fathers of families‘, neither would suggest that political government could be comparable to ‘marriage‘.
出版日期Book 2004
关键词Familie; liberty; seventeenth century
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504776
isbn_softcover978-1-349-51461-8
isbn_ebook978-0-230-50477-6
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought网络公开度




书目名称Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought被引频次




书目名称Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought被引频次学科排名




书目名称Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought年度引用




书目名称Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought年度引用学科排名




书目名称Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought读者反馈




书目名称Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:19:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:34:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:15:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:38:36 | 显示全部楼层
Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought978-0-230-50477-6
发表于 2025-3-22 15:42:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:40:10 | 显示全部楼层
“Union is a marriage”when he set out his plan, James described the Union as a marriage not simply because this was a “favorite analogy,” a comfortable, “homely image,” or even a useful polemical trope, but because it set out every ideological and practical aspect of the bond he wanted to establish – between his kingdoms
发表于 2025-3-22 21:48:17 | 显示全部楼层
“A mutuall covenant betwixt King and people”two national churches, similar only in appearance.. In the first decade or so of his own reign, Charles – who was far more English than Scots – apparently accepted this situation as well, though he made efforts to bring together the subjects of his two kingdoms through other projects. By the mid-163
发表于 2025-3-23 02:27:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:51:19 | 显示全部楼层
“Life, Liberty and Dower”when he portrayed himself as married to his kingdoms. For his subjects, marriage would have brought a similar, if less exalted, transformation. As the coronation “marriage” converted a royal heir into a ruler, every man’s marriage marked the step from subjection within the household of father or mas
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-20 21:00
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表