找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences; Stemming the Tide Karl Spracklen Book 2016 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publisher

[复制链接]
楼主: EXERT
发表于 2025-3-23 11:09:13 | 显示全部楼层
Karl Spracklenction, we studied three different multilabel classification problems, the largest being the categorization into the EUROVOC concept hierarchy with almost 4000 classes. We evaluated three algorithms: (i) the binary relevance approach which independently trains one classifier per label; (ii) the multi
发表于 2025-3-23 14:16:20 | 显示全部楼层
tain a cluster structure over the data points generated by the entire network. Usual techniques operate by forwarding and concentrating the entire data in a central server, processing it as a multivariate stream. In this paper, we propose ., a new distributed algorithm which reduces both the dimensi
发表于 2025-3-23 20:41:06 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2016rs because they discover ‘truths‘, make money, and help governments solve problems. In turn, defenders of the social sciences borrow the language of instrumentality, profit and policy impact. Karl Spracklen, by contrast, makes the moral case for the social sciences, arguing that they are a necessary
发表于 2025-3-24 02:08:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 06:22:34 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,ernments solve problems. Spracklen establishes critical sociology as the theoretical framework through which he will analyse the relationship between the natural sciences and the social sciences, and through which he will make the moral case for social sciences in the rest of the book.
发表于 2025-3-24 10:07:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 14:26:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 17:13:53 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion,moral case, and to work to ensure the moral case is central to their teaching and their research, then suggests practical steps that might be taken to help social scientists resist the pressure to be instrumental in their work.
发表于 2025-3-24 20:54:26 | 显示全部楼层
The Attack on Social Sciences,, the natural sciences retain a privileged place in the ways of thinking and ways of legitimizing knowledge and power in the modern world. STEM thinking makes as common-sense truth the contested claim that all human experience can be reduced to its economic value, and everything social can be reduced to the natural or discarded as false knowledge.
发表于 2025-3-24 23:24:24 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-19 17:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表