| 书目名称 | Logical Models of Legal Argumentation | | 编辑 | Henry Prakken,Giovanni Sartor | | 视频video | | | 图书封面 |  | | 描述 | In the study of forms of legal reasoning, logic andargumentation theory long followed separate tracks. `Legal logicians‘tended to focus on a deductive reconstruction of justifying adecision, disregarding the dialectical process leading to the chosenjustification. Others instead emphasized the adversarial anddiscretionary nature of legal reasoning, involving reasonableevaluation of alternative choices, and the use of analogicalreasoning. .Recently, however, developments in Artificial Intelligence and Lawhave paved the way for overcoming this separation. Logic has widenedits scope to defensible argumentation, and informal accounts ofanalogy and dialectics have inspired the construction of computerprograms. Thus the prospect is emerging of an integrated logical anddialectical account of legal argument, adding to the understanding oflegal reasoning, and providing a formal basis for computer tools thatassist and mediate legal debates while leaving room for humaninitiative. .This book presents contributions to this development. From a logicalpoint of view it covers topics such as evaluating conflictingarguments, weighing reasons, modelling legal disputes as a dialoguegame, the role of th | | 出版日期 | Book 1997 | | 关键词 | Argumentation; Argumentation Theory; Legal Logic; analogy; legal argumentation; logic | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5668-4 | | isbn_softcover | 978-94-010-6390-6 | | isbn_ebook | 978-94-011-5668-4 | | copyright | Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
发表于 2025-3-21 16:36:26
