找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logical Empiricism and Naturalism; Neurath and Carnap’s Joseph Bentley Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exc

[复制链接]
查看: 24448|回复: 39
发表于 2025-3-21 19:31:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Logical Empiricism and Naturalism
副标题Neurath and Carnap’s
编辑Joseph Bentley
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/589/588134/588134.mp4
概述Argues for the fundamental compatibility of Neurath and Carnap’s mature philosophies.Provides a new interpretation of Carnap’s conception of analyticity.The first book-length defence of the Bipartite
丛书名称Vienna Circle Institute Library
图书封面Titlebook: Logical Empiricism and Naturalism; Neurath and Carnap’s Joseph Bentley Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exc
描述.This text provides an extensive exploration of the relationship between the thought of Otto Neurath and Rudolf Carnap, providing a new argument for the complementarity of their mature philosophies as part of a collaborative metatheory of science. In arguing that both Neurath and Carnap must be interpreted as proponents of epistemological naturalism, and that their naturalisms rest on shared philosophical ground, it is also demonstrated that the boundaries and possibilities for epistemological naturalism are not as restrictive as Quinean orthodoxy has previously suggested. Both building on and challenging the scholarship of the past four decades, this naturalist reading of Carnap also provides a new interpretation of Carnap’s conception of analyticity, allowing for a refutation of the Quinean argument for the incompatibility of naturalism and the analytic/synthetic distinction. In doing so, the relevance and potential importance of their scientific meta-theory for contemporary questions in the philosophy of science is demonstrated..This text appeals to students and researchers working on Logical Empiricism, Quine, the history of analytic philosophy and the history of philosophy of
出版日期Book 2023
关键词rudolf carnap; W; V; O; Quine; Naturalism and philosophy; Vienna Circle Books; Philosophy of Science books
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29328-3
isbn_softcover978-3-031-29330-6
isbn_ebook978-3-031-29328-3Series ISSN 1571-3083
issn_series 1571-3083
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Logical Empiricism and Naturalism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Logical Empiricism and Naturalism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Logical Empiricism and Naturalism网络公开度




书目名称Logical Empiricism and Naturalism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Logical Empiricism and Naturalism被引频次




书目名称Logical Empiricism and Naturalism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Logical Empiricism and Naturalism年度引用




书目名称Logical Empiricism and Naturalism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Logical Empiricism and Naturalism读者反馈




书目名称Logical Empiricism and Naturalism读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:36:15 | 显示全部楼层
,Neurath’s Conception of Protocol Statements, works therefore require more exegesis than other philosophers’. Here, I attempt to provide what Neurath did not; a detailed account of and argument for Neurath’s conception of protocol statements from the ground up.
发表于 2025-3-22 00:49:21 | 显示全部楼层
Carnapian Explication,c practice. The answer, as will be demonstrated, is yes. Carnap’s method of explication allows the logician of science to contribute to the scientific endeavor both and increased awareness of, and consequent deepening, of scientific practice but also the provision of linguistic and logical innovations.
发表于 2025-3-22 08:23:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:36:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:11:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:19:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:47:17 | 显示全部楼层
Logical Empiricism and Naturalism978-3-031-29328-3Series ISSN 1571-3083
发表于 2025-3-23 04:13:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:15:54 | 显示全部楼层
Bipartite Metatheory in Application,The previous chapter demonstrated the compatibility of Neurath and Carnap’s projects, but only in the negative sense of eliminating lingering worries about potential theoretical incompatibilities between them. In what follows, I will show how the two halves of the metatheory are relevant to one another, and the consequences of this collaboration.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-11 02:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表