找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logic in Question; Talks from the Annua Jean-Yves Béziau,Jean-Pierre Desclés,Anca Christin Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

[复制链接]
查看: 22836|回复: 56
发表于 2025-3-21 16:13:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Logic in Question
副标题Talks from the Annua
编辑Jean-Yves Béziau,Jean-Pierre Desclés,Anca Christin
视频video
概述Collects papers related to the annual Logic in Question workshop at Sorbonne University.Uses an interdisciplinary approach to explore the current state and future of the field of logic.Provides a uniq
丛书名称Studies in Universal Logic
图书封面Titlebook: Logic in Question; Talks from the Annua Jean-Yves Béziau,Jean-Pierre Desclés,Anca Christin Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The
描述This contributed volume collects papers related to the Logic in Question workshop, which has taken place annually at Sorbonne University in Paris since 2011. Each year, the workshop brings together historians, philosophers, mathematicians, linguists, and computer scientists to explore questions related to the nature of logic and how it has developed over the years. As a result, chapter authors provide a thorough, interdisciplinary exploration of topics that have been studied in the workshop. Organized into three sections, the first part of the book focuses on historical questions related to logic, the second explores philosophical questions, and the third section is dedicated to mathematical discussions. Specific topics include:.• logic and analogy• Chinese logic.• nineteenth century British logic (in particular Boole and Lewis Carroll).• logical diagrams .• the place and value of logic in Louis Couturat’s philosophical thinking.• contributions of logical analysis for mathematics education.• the exceptionality of logic.• the logical expressive power of natural languages.• the unification of mathematics via topos theory.Logic in Question. will appeal to pure logicians, historians of
出版日期Book 2022
关键词history of logic; philosophical logic; philosophical thinking; logical reasoning; Boolean logic
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94452-0
isbn_softcover978-3-030-94454-4
isbn_ebook978-3-030-94452-0Series ISSN 2297-0282 Series E-ISSN 2297-0290
issn_series 2297-0282
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Logic in Question影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Logic in Question影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Logic in Question网络公开度




书目名称Logic in Question网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Logic in Question被引频次




书目名称Logic in Question被引频次学科排名




书目名称Logic in Question年度引用




书目名称Logic in Question年度引用学科排名




书目名称Logic in Question读者反馈




书目名称Logic in Question读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:23:36 | 显示全部楼层
Boole’s Untruth Tables: The Formal Conditions of Meaning Before the Emergence of Propositional Logicelopment into normal forms, and the non-logical origin of the constants 0 and 1 as dual terms. Boole’s system of logic is in this way shown to be chiefly concerned with the problem of the formal interpretability conditions of symbolic expressions, rather than with the truth conditions of logical propositions.
发表于 2025-3-22 02:24:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:19:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:06:38 | 显示全部楼层
Definition and Inference in Leśniewski’s Logical system and why the eliminability of a definition does not imply its logical neutrality. For this purpose, we explore certain important but often neglected results about definitions established by Leśniewski, Łukasiewicz, and Tarski in the 1920s.
发表于 2025-3-22 16:33:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:25:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:04:11 | 显示全部楼层
The Representation of Negative Terms with Euler Diagrams logicians modified the data of the problem at hand, others amended the diagrams, and another group changed the mode of representation. We also consider how modern diagrammatic systems represent negation.
发表于 2025-3-23 04:28:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:52:31 | 显示全部楼层
What Is the Relation Between Peirce’s Logic and His Philosophy of Logic?ic. Being mostly inductive and abductive, the inquiry cannot be expressed through formal logics. It shows that the contemporary meaning of logic cannot be separated from its Peircian use: Logic and philosophy of science come together, and it may paradoxically be this faith which motivated most of the formal advances of Peirce’s logic.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-26 15:34
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表