找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie; G. H. Wright Book 1980 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague 1980 epistemology.interpre

[复制链接]
查看: 21080|回复: 46
发表于 2025-3-21 19:52:10 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie
编辑G. H. Wright
视频video
丛书名称Institut International de Philosophie
图书封面Titlebook: Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie;  G. H. Wright Book 1980 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague 1980 epistemology.interpre
描述The Entretiens of the Institut International de Philosophie for 1978 were held in connection with the World Congress of Philosophy in Dusseldorf, from August 27 to September 1. The theme of the Entretiens was Logic and Philosophy (Logique et philosophie). The undersigned, then President of LI.P., was responsible for the planning of the programme. The programme was designed to consist of four sections with the headings Classical and Intuitionist Logic, Modal Logic and its Applications, Inductive Logic and its Applications, and Logic and Epistemology. The aim was also to convey to philosophers who are not experts in logic an informative and representative impression of some of the main sectors of the vast and rapidly expanding field of philosophical logic. At the same time it was thought that this impression should not be conveyed in the form of a series of survey papers but through presentations and discussions of specific topics falling under the main headings men­ tioned above. For each section a rapporteur was nominated to read a paper and an interlocuteur to comment on it. The programme chairman is grateful that he was able to engage a representative selection of front rank phil
出版日期Book 1980
关键词epistemology; interpret; logic; modal logic; philosophical logic; philosophy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8820-0
isbn_softcover978-94-009-8822-4
isbn_ebook978-94-009-8820-0
copyrightMartinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague 1980
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie网络公开度




书目名称Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie被引频次




书目名称Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie被引频次学科排名




书目名称Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie年度引用




书目名称Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie年度引用学科排名




书目名称Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie读者反馈




书目名称Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:59:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:20:46 | 显示全部楼层
Intuitionistic Logic: A Philosophical Challenge, In our deductive practice, we take, in fact, a stand on this conflict; even if we try to reconcile the two logics, our actual reasoning will usually show a clear preference for one of them. In philosophy, furthermore, we should reflect on our deductive practice and should be able to formulate explicitly what kind of reasoning is correct.
发表于 2025-3-22 07:23:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:10:39 | 显示全部楼层
On Certainty, Evidence and Probability,hisholm which are referred to in his present one, so that I cannot exclude that answers to some of my questions might be found there. It seems useful, however, to raise these questions at least in order to make his present paper more self-contained.
发表于 2025-3-22 15:09:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:12:03 | 显示全部楼层
Two Successor Concepts to the Notion of Statistical Explanation,f philosophers of science who believe that we should try to explicate all important metascientific notions, like “theory,” “disposition,” “law,” “confirmation” or “corroboration” and, of course, “explanation,” on the abstract level of general philosophy of science. This attitude mirrors the conviction that such explications are possible.
发表于 2025-3-23 01:02:42 | 显示全部楼层
,Comment on “Some Remarks on Statistical Explanations” by Professor Suppes,under discussion. If I am right it is not so much a contrast of views on particular items, nontechnical or technical ones, as a difference in philosophical attitude to questions in the philosophy of science. I therefore hope that some additional remarks will help to clarify the issue.
发表于 2025-3-23 02:44:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:41:08 | 显示全部楼层
Epistemic Reasoning and the Logic of Epistemic Concepts,ity. The other is to view it as a branch of the logic of preferability. In the present paper, I will take the second approach, making use of the following concepts: (a) .; (b) . necessity; (c) ., or .; and (d) ., or belief
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-28 01:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表