找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logic and Language; Studies dedicated to B. H. Kazemier,D. Vuysje Book 1962 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1962 Rudolf Carnap.encyclo

[复制链接]
查看: 7383|回复: 56
发表于 2025-3-21 16:21:10 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Logic and Language
副标题Studies dedicated to
编辑B. H. Kazemier,D. Vuysje
视频video
丛书名称Synthese Library
图书封面Titlebook: Logic and Language; Studies dedicated to B. H. Kazemier,D. Vuysje Book 1962 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1962 Rudolf Carnap.encyclo
出版日期Book 1962
关键词Rudolf Carnap; encyclopedia; epistemology; event; history of literature; language; logic; mathematics; organ
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2111-0
isbn_softcover978-90-481-8319-7
isbn_ebook978-94-017-2111-0Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
issn_series 0166-6991
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 1962
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Logic and Language影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Logic and Language影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Logic and Language网络公开度




书目名称Logic and Language网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Logic and Language被引频次




书目名称Logic and Language被引频次学科排名




书目名称Logic and Language年度引用




书目名称Logic and Language年度引用学科排名




书目名称Logic and Language读者反馈




书目名称Logic and Language读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:02:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:26:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:31:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:00:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:04:42 | 显示全部楼层
On the History of the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, own letters. On my desk as I write this is a pile of letters from those years well over a foot high. I have re-read most of them for this occasion of paying homage to Carnap. Some historical facts which I salvaged — especially concerning the . — seem to me of sufficient interest to record briefly.
发表于 2025-3-22 18:18:20 | 显示全部楼层
A Prerequisite for Rational Philosophical Discussion,randing large parts of the output of their speculative colleagues as ‘nonsense’ and ‘literally unintelligible’. Speculative metaphysicians, after having recovered from the first shock, either just disregard these declarations, or else declare, on their part, that the standards of intelligibility employed by the critics are arbitrary.
发表于 2025-3-22 23:53:46 | 显示全部楼层
Some Remarks Concerning Languages, Calculuses, and Logic,pe, draw the conclusion, that I have found it necessary to try to give a contribution to his 70th birthday as an expression of my gratitude for his stimulating works and for the friendliness he has shown to me during the time, of peace and war, we have known each other.
发表于 2025-3-23 03:43:34 | 显示全部楼层
978-90-481-8319-7Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1962
发表于 2025-3-23 06:03:11 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-30 20:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表