找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logic and Ethics; Peter Geach,Jacek Holowka Book 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991 deontic logic.ethics.logic.morality

[复制链接]
楼主: 不服从
发表于 2025-3-23 10:04:37 | 显示全部楼层
On Fair Distribution of Indivisible Goods,Suppose that . indivisible objects are to be distributed among . persons, in the sense that each object will be ascribed to a single person. What are the requirements of justice for a procedure effecting the distribution, i.e. for a function from the set of objects to the set of persons?
发表于 2025-3-23 14:17:16 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3352-4deontic logic; ethics; logic; morality
发表于 2025-3-23 18:44:53 | 显示全部楼层
Nijhoff International Philosophy Serieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/587960.jpg
发表于 2025-3-23 22:37:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 02:27:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 07:08:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 14:38:21 | 显示全部楼层
Whatever happened to Deontic Logic?,where argued, with Aristotle’s logic: he began by distinguishing two sharply distinct categories, names . and predicables .but came to merge these categories in the category of terms . which could pass freely between subject—role and predicate—role. So it happened also, I shall now argue, with deont
发表于 2025-3-24 18:28:45 | 显示全部楼层
The Ethical Root of Language, we may do harm, not for harm’s sake, but for some other reason: but then, if the harm has been culpable, we are likely to hate the one who has suffered the injury. Now, if I thus unjustly hate a man, I am likely to think ill of him, and am disposed to believe that he has done things which he has no
发表于 2025-3-24 22:02:04 | 显示全部楼层
Deontic Logic and Imperative Logic,rmed to the verification principle, but was not a form of naturalism. Naturalism was supposed to have been refuted by G.E. Moore; but then if one was not a naturalist, one must, it was supposed, be an intuitionist, and such a view was too facile a solution to one’s epistemological problems to be pla
发表于 2025-3-25 02:00:34 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-27 14:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表