找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logic Without Gaps or Gluts; How to Solve the Par Benjamin Alan Burgis Book 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 Paraconsistent logic.D

[复制链接]
查看: 7775|回复: 42
发表于 2025-3-21 16:41:37 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Logic Without Gaps or Gluts
副标题How to Solve the Par
编辑Benjamin Alan Burgis
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/588/587945/587945.mp4
概述Argues that the paradoxes give no reason to reject classical logic.The first full-length book to deal with this topic indepthly.Touches on the work of Graham Priest, Hartry Field and JC Beal.
丛书名称Synthese Library
图书封面Titlebook: Logic Without Gaps or Gluts; How to Solve the Par Benjamin Alan Burgis Book 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 Paraconsistent logic.D
描述.This book offers a defense against non-classical approaches to the paradoxes. The author argues that, despite appearances, the paradoxes give no reason at all to reject classical logic. In fact, he believes classical solutions fare better than non-classical ones with respect to key tests like Curry’s Paradox, a Liar-like paradox that dialetheists are forced to solve in a way totally disjoint from their solution to the Liar. ..Graham Priest’s .In Contradiction .was the first major work that advocated the use of non-classical approaches. Since then, these views have moved into the philosophical mainstream. Much of this movement is fueled by a widespread sense that these logically heterodox solutions get to the real nub of the issue. They lack the ad hoc feel of many other solutions to the paradoxes. The author believes that it‘s long past time for a response to these attacks against classical orthodoxy. He presents a non-logically-revisionary solution to the paradoxes...This title offers a literal way of cashing out the disquotation metaphor. While the details of the view are novel, the idea has a pre-history in the relevant literature. The author examines objections in detail. He r
出版日期Book 2022
关键词Paraconsistent logic; Dialetheism Excluded Middle; Disquotationalism; Graham Priest; Hartry Field; JC Bea
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94624-1
isbn_softcover978-3-030-94626-5
isbn_ebook978-3-030-94624-1Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
issn_series 0166-6991
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Logic Without Gaps or Gluts影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Logic Without Gaps or Gluts影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Logic Without Gaps or Gluts网络公开度




书目名称Logic Without Gaps or Gluts网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Logic Without Gaps or Gluts被引频次




书目名称Logic Without Gaps or Gluts被引频次学科排名




书目名称Logic Without Gaps or Gluts年度引用




书目名称Logic Without Gaps or Gluts年度引用学科排名




书目名称Logic Without Gaps or Gluts读者反馈




书目名称Logic Without Gaps or Gluts读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:38:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:24:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:33:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:30:45 | 显示全部楼层
Logic Without Gaps or Gluts978-3-030-94624-1Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
发表于 2025-3-22 13:13:00 | 显示全部楼层
Logic and the Liar Paradox,e (LEM) and the Law of Non-Contradiction (LNC). Dialetheists such as Graham Priest and JC Beall solve the paradoxes by accepting the negations of some instances of the LNC and rejecting classical logic in favor of a “paraconsistent” logical framework in which contradictions do not entail every concl
发表于 2025-3-22 18:09:38 | 显示全部楼层
Graham Priest and Dialetheism,st argument for dialetheism. Indeed, apart from Graham Priest, most dialetheists regard contradicts about the alethetic status of paradoxical sentences as the . true contradictions. Priest, however, has made independent arguments for true contradictions in several other domains. He postulates true m
发表于 2025-3-23 00:00:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:21:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:20:39 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-9 07:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表