找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logic Counts; Ewa Żarnecka-Biały Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 Aristotle.Plato.logic.philosophy.truth

[复制链接]
楼主: endocarditis
发表于 2025-3-23 09:59:58 | 显示全部楼层
Ontologies and Ontologicscal analysis leads to rather troublesome questions: Are philosophical disciplines methodologically and/or essentially related and connected? Are particular philosophical disciplines scientific? And, if the answer is not definite, to what extent is this so? Do philosophical disciplines form a uniform
发表于 2025-3-23 16:19:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 19:08:16 | 显示全部楼层
Two Levels of Modality: An Algebraic Approachlogics, namely those associated with algebraic models. It is an attempt to study modal logics within the framework of the theory of abstract logics. We begin by recalling some terms, constructions and notations, mainly taken from Brown & Suszko (1973).
发表于 2025-3-23 22:40:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 04:20:57 | 显示全部楼层
When May G. E. Moore’s Definition of Internal Relation be Used Rationally?n controversy over the nature of relations. The author of that definition was right in his claim that the sense he established was metaphysically neutral for its serviceability in expressing each of the three positions to be separated in the dispute. Neohegelians saying that every relation is intern
发表于 2025-3-24 08:07:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 12:07:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 16:43:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 21:58:02 | 显示全部楼层
Basic Norm and Metalanguage. Historical Bckground of Kelsen’s Ideasrofessor of international law and legal philosophy Alfred VERDROSS (1890–1980) — the pure theory of law — is the “most refined and most successful” theory of law.. It should be mentioned that VERDROSS held a strong natural law position — quite contrary to KELSEN. According to another student of KELS
发表于 2025-3-25 03:01:34 | 显示全部楼层
Early Systems of Formal Pragmaticsatics is, and still worse — I am afraid nobody does. In fact, the dispute on the aims, methods, scope and limits of pragmatics started as early as in the late thirties, and continues up to now. The discussion is far from being concluded, and that is just why you can still find there in the literatur
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-28 10:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表