找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Lives, Liberties and the Public Good; Essays on Political George Feaver (Professor of Political Science),Fre Book 1987 Palgrave Macmillan,

[复制链接]
楼主: 气泡
发表于 2025-3-25 07:08:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 09:10:13 | 显示全部楼层
Innovation and the Public Good: On Understanding the Logic of Liberty,cteristic feature which distinguishes the dynamic modern state from the static pre-modern one. The advent of the idea, and the ideal, of unlimited progress together with the extraordinary successes of modern technological development are responsible for this belief. Technological achievements and th
发表于 2025-3-25 13:25:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 18:38:51 | 显示全部楼层
Loyalty, Liberalism and the State,offered all the land he could walk round before the sun set, tried for too much and dropped dead trying to make it back to his starting point before the deadline. States, too, have often demanded excessive loyalty from their subjects, and sometimes expired in consequence. Liberalism may almost be de
发表于 2025-3-25 20:24:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 00:29:07 | 显示全部楼层
Policy-Making, Discretionary Judgement, and Liberty,judgements can be contained and regulated by law, then the hope of constitutional government would remain feasible. Arbitrary decision, wilful and lawless, is the enemy of liberty; but discretionary judgement is its essential servant.
发表于 2025-3-26 05:09:33 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction: Lives, Liberties and the Public Good,violate any other man’s rights’.. In the ., also published in 1689, though composed in part as much as a decade before, Locke defines ‘.’ as ‘a . of Making Laws with Penalties of Death, and consequently all less Penalties, for the Regulating and Preserving of Property … and all this only for .’..
发表于 2025-3-26 12:28:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 16:17:10 | 显示全部楼层
,Rousseau’s Two Concepts of Liberty,activities of others who sought to realise them in practice. What is peculiar about Rousseau’s reputation among pre-eminent political theorists, however, is the extent to which his critics are agreed that he could not have been committed to the philosophy he actually set forth.
发表于 2025-3-26 16:53:55 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-29 05:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表