找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Literary History Writing, 1770-1820; April London Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2010 culture.hi

[复制链接]
查看: 55369|回复: 47
发表于 2025-3-21 19:25:41 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Literary History Writing, 1770-1820
编辑April London
视频video
丛书名称Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and Cultures of Print
图书封面Titlebook: Literary History Writing, 1770-1820;  April London Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2010 culture.hi
描述This investigation of literary history writing between 1770 and 1820 identifies the mode‘s distinction from canon formation as central to its cultural vitality. Using secret history, memoir and the novel, amongst other sources, it invites a re-thinking of literary history‘s place in late eighteenth and early nineteenth-century print culture.
出版日期Book 2010
关键词culture; history of literature; novel; structure; British and Irish Literature
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283336
isbn_softcover978-1-349-32037-0
isbn_ebook978-0-230-28333-6Series ISSN 2634-6516 Series E-ISSN 2634-6524
issn_series 2634-6516
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2010
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Literary History Writing, 1770-1820影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Literary History Writing, 1770-1820影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Literary History Writing, 1770-1820网络公开度




书目名称Literary History Writing, 1770-1820网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Literary History Writing, 1770-1820被引频次




书目名称Literary History Writing, 1770-1820被引频次学科排名




书目名称Literary History Writing, 1770-1820年度引用




书目名称Literary History Writing, 1770-1820年度引用学科排名




书目名称Literary History Writing, 1770-1820读者反馈




书目名称Literary History Writing, 1770-1820读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:36:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:16:41 | 显示全部楼层
Introductiond our competence. The “now” in this sentence, and the fact that all three quotations in my epigraph are from twentieth- to twenty-first-century critics, speak to the fact that the enterprise has come to seem more elusive and contested even as it has become more sophisticated and self-conscious. The
发表于 2025-3-22 06:50:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:54:44 | 显示全部楼层
Rewriting Lives: Revolution, Reaction, and Apostasyical conventions to explain literary developments.. Attention to patterns of cultural evolution helps them to meet readerly expectations of clarity and comprehensiveness, while also offsetting what each represents as the idiosyncrasies and even tyrannies of commentators like Johnson, Hurd, and Knox.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:35:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:45:35 | 显示全部楼层
Literary History and Literary Specimensmens, and leave them to form their own opinions … Better a thousand times is the plodding task of copying the dullest extracts … These the profound antiquary, the philosophic investigator of ancient language and ancient manners, will know how to appreciate; while the praise or the jest of the flippa
发表于 2025-3-23 00:54:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:00:59 | 显示全部楼层
The Structures of Opinion“aweful voice of public opinion”:.By the late 1790s, he no longer subscribed to this progressivist view of opinion as a broadly diffused and potentially beneficent force. Rather than its being mobilized for noble ends, it becomes the engine through which extreme radicals express their violence and “
发表于 2025-3-23 06:39:19 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-25 19:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表