找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Linguistic Analysis and Phenomenology; Wolfe Mays (Reader in Philosophy, Editor of ‘The J Book 1972 The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1972

[复制链接]
楼主: 外表
发表于 2025-3-28 15:43:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 20:20:56 | 显示全部楼层
Reply to Miss Berry’s Paper, her point is that Biran’s position somehow stands for a wider philosophical persuasion, viz., that of phenomenology. If this understanding is correct it may be advisable first to look briefly into her criticism of Biran and next into the relevance of this criticism to phenomenology. Finally, we sh
发表于 2025-3-29 00:33:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 05:55:48 | 显示全部楼层
The Two Personsbeen attacked from various points of view. Many of these attacks, however, so far from rejecting what is usually known as Cartesian dualism, have merely launched the same doctrine under a new rig. They have distinguished between mental and physical objects, processes and cognitions (between ideas an
发表于 2025-3-29 08:47:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 13:09:43 | 显示全部楼层
The Critic and the Lover of Artnorm actually exists. It seems that he recognised that if there is no common aesthetic sense a universal community of taste could not be achieved simply by everyone’s contemplating Nature and Art disinterestedly, for he suggests that if this common sense does not exist the demand of the judgement of
发表于 2025-3-29 19:16:57 | 显示全部楼层
Commentary on Mr Elliott’s Paperin deep agreement with its author; and how could it be otherwise, when Mr Elliott is so kind as to invoke me, and when he has perfectly understood what I have tried to say elsewhere ? If I enter this discussion with him, it is in no sense to present a contrary thesis, but to take up and extend his r
发表于 2025-3-29 22:55:35 | 显示全部楼层
Chairman’s Opening Remarksnts are in principle correct or incorrect. Whether they admit it or not, they are passing verdicts for which reasoned justification could be provided. This view, he maintains, is not merely unduly restrictive, it is essentially mistaken. It presupposes either some kind of natural norm (perhaps a com
发表于 2025-3-30 02:15:36 | 显示全部楼层
A Reply to ‘A Person’s Future and the Mind—Body Problem’ritish philosophy (e.g. the analysis of the logical priority of the concept of ‘person’) with those of Continental philosophy (e.g. the more phenomenological analysis of the future-dimension of human existence).
发表于 2025-3-30 07:05:07 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-28 15:16
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表