找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Liability Rules in Patent Law; A Legal and Economic Daniel Krauspenhaar Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

[复制链接]
查看: 10649|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 18:13:27 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Liability Rules in Patent Law
副标题A Legal and Economic
编辑Daniel Krauspenhaar
视频video
概述Interdisciplinary research at the interface of law, business administration and economics.Perspectives for improvement of the patent system.Focus on whether and under which conditions patents should b
丛书名称Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition
图书封面Titlebook: Liability Rules in Patent Law; A Legal and Economic Daniel Krauspenhaar Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex
描述The primary purpose of a patent law system should be to enhance economic efficiency, in particular by providing incentives for making inventions. The conventional wisdom is that patents should therefore be strictly exclusive rights. Moreover, in practice patent owners are almost never forced to give up their right to exclude others and receive only a certain amount of remuneration with, for instance, compulsory licensing. Other economically interesting patent-law objectives, however, include the transfer and dissemination of knowledge. Mechanisms exist by which the patent owner decides if he or she would prefer exclusive or non-exclusive rights, for instance the opportunity to declare the willingness to license and create patent pools. But it is questionable whether these mechanisms are sufficient and efficient enough in view of the existence of patent trolls and other problems. This work challenges the conventional wisdom to a certain extent and makes proposals for improvements.
出版日期Book 2015
关键词Compulsory license; Exclusivity; Liability rules; License of right; Property rules
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40900-4
isbn_softcover978-3-662-52489-3
isbn_ebook978-3-642-40900-4Series ISSN 2199-7462 Series E-ISSN 2199-7470
issn_series 2199-7462
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Liability Rules in Patent Law影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Liability Rules in Patent Law影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Liability Rules in Patent Law网络公开度




书目名称Liability Rules in Patent Law网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Liability Rules in Patent Law被引频次




书目名称Liability Rules in Patent Law被引频次学科排名




书目名称Liability Rules in Patent Law年度引用




书目名称Liability Rules in Patent Law年度引用学科排名




书目名称Liability Rules in Patent Law读者反馈




书目名称Liability Rules in Patent Law读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:49:25 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2015conventional wisdom is that patents should therefore be strictly exclusive rights. Moreover, in practice patent owners are almost never forced to give up their right to exclude others and receive only a certain amount of remuneration with, for instance, compulsory licensing. Other economically inter
发表于 2025-3-22 01:23:39 | 显示全部楼层
Private Liability Rule Regimes,ally in the following discussion, is whether private liability rules sufficiently reduce the overuse of property rules. An additional question will be whether it is possible to support even more efficient use of those mechanisms than is currently the case.
发表于 2025-3-22 08:31:09 | 显示全部楼层
Introductory Remarks,e, at least with reference to the situation in the developed countries. Exactly how an optimal system should look, however, is the subject of continuous debate. For some time, there has been a discussion underway about the phenomena of the current patent law system. New terms such as ., ., . or . ar
发表于 2025-3-22 09:54:13 | 显示全部楼层
Overuse of Exclusivity in Patent Law,ourage innovation and, in general, to reach economic efficiency. On the one hand, the question is, therefore, whether the current German patent law system (including German and European antitrust laws), as it is currently applied, and the future system under the regulation on the European Patent wit
发表于 2025-3-22 14:38:24 | 显示全部楼层
Private Liability Rule Regimes,lso in the regulation on the European Patent with Unitary Effect; relying so intensively on property rules is also not mandatory from other perspectives such as distributional preferences and higher-ranking law. Another question, which has not been answered until now and should be addressed specific
发表于 2025-3-22 20:37:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:13:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:37:23 | 显示全部楼层
Daniel Krauspenhaarny Norwegian psychologists across a wide scope of fields integrate and adopt CP principles in their work. Yet, the critical and political nature of CP has been absent. This situation is explained on the basis of sociocultural and political conditions. The ideals of social justice and security, empow
发表于 2025-3-23 07:12:46 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-24 05:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表