找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Leibniz and the Kabbalah; Allison P. Coudert Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.Jan Baptis

[复制链接]
查看: 8358|回复: 41
发表于 2025-3-21 16:44:22 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Leibniz and the Kabbalah
编辑Allison P. Coudert
视频video
丛书名称International Archives of the History of Ideas‘ Archives internationales d‘histoire des idées
图书封面Titlebook: Leibniz and the Kabbalah;  Allison P. Coudert Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.Jan Baptis
描述The general view of scholars is that the Kabbalah had no meaningful influence on Leibniz‘s thought. } But on the basis of new evidence I am convinced that the question must be reopened. The Kabbalah did influence Leibniz, and a recognition of this will lead to both a better understanding of the supposed "quirkiness,,2 of Leibniz‘s philosophy and an appreciation ofthe Kabbalah as an integral but hitherto ignored factor in the emergence of the modem secular and scientifically oriented world. During the past twenty years there has been increasing willingness to recognize the important ways in which mystical and occult thinking contributed to the development of science and the emergence 3 of toleration. However, the Kabbalah, particularly the Lurianic Kabbalah with its monistic vitalism and optimistic philosophy of perfectionism and universal salvation, has not yet been integrated into the new historiography, although it richly deserves to be. On the basis of manuscripts in libraries at Hanover and Wolfenbiittel, it is clear that Leibniz‘s relationship with Francis Mercury van Helmont (1614- 1698) and Christian Knorr von Rosenroth (1636-1689), the two leading Christian Kabbalists of th
出版日期Book 1995
关键词Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz; Jan Baptist van Helmont; Kabbalah; Leibniz Studies; Lurianic Kabbalah; Voltair
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2069-4
isbn_softcover978-90-481-4465-5
isbn_ebook978-94-017-2069-4Series ISSN 0066-6610 Series E-ISSN 2215-0307
issn_series 0066-6610
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Leibniz and the Kabbalah影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Leibniz and the Kabbalah影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Leibniz and the Kabbalah网络公开度




书目名称Leibniz and the Kabbalah网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Leibniz and the Kabbalah被引频次




书目名称Leibniz and the Kabbalah被引频次学科排名




书目名称Leibniz and the Kabbalah年度引用




书目名称Leibniz and the Kabbalah年度引用学科排名




书目名称Leibniz and the Kabbalah读者反馈




书目名称Leibniz and the Kabbalah读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:11:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:09:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:44:29 | 显示全部楼层
The Kabbalah and Freedom and Determinism,The problem of individuality and freedom within a larger framework of order and stability was a basic issue in the seventeenth century.. Although Leibniz tried to carve out an area of freedom for the individual in his philosophy, most of his contemporaries as well as his critics (right up to the present) agree that he failed..
发表于 2025-3-22 12:43:41 | 显示全部楼层
,The Kabbalah and Leibniz’s Theodicy,hed by Fichant. In the one written in 1693, ., Leibniz argues that if human beings were to exist for long enough, there would inevitably come a time when everything that could be enunciated and written down would already have been enunciated and written down, and people would simply begin to repeat themselves:
发表于 2025-3-22 13:40:29 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion, better themselves; and this, in turn, encouraged the humanitarian outlook and activist philosophy that separates van Helmont and Leibniz from so many of their contemporaries, contemporaries who loathed and feared the common people and objected to any kind of progressive social policy on the grounds that it would undermine the ..
发表于 2025-3-22 20:10:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:26:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:09:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:17:37 | 显示全部楼层
Van Helmont, Leibniz, and the Kabbalah,, van Helmont was closest to him both personally and in terms of his thought.. R. W. Meyer also recognized “many intellectual affinities between the two men.” He believed Leibniz had appropriated the term “monad” from van Helmont, but he did not think that was enough to bridge the vast difference be
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-21 21:10
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表