Titlebook: Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance; Analyzing IANA Trans Nicola Palladino,Mauro Santaniello Bo

Body-Mass-Index

书目名称Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance网络公开度




书目名称Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance被引频次




书目名称Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance被引频次学科排名




书目名称Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance年度引用




书目名称Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance年度引用学科排名




书目名称Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance读者反馈




书目名称Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance读者反馈学科排名

Ornament

ALIBI

低能儿

受辱

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56131-4Internet Governance; Multistakeholder Governance; IANA Transition; Domain Name System; Internet policy

Euphonious

2946-3297 rative and discursive dimensions of the process, and the out.This book aims to develop a critical understanding of multistakeholder governance in Internet Governance through an in-depth analysis of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) transition, the process through which the U.S. Governme

STALL

The Institutional Design of the IANA Transition Process,dure of the different bodies entrusted to draft the proposal, and draws on the huge amount of available documentation, including official statements, charters, public comments and submissions, meeting transcripts, and reports. It also gives an account of the content of deliberation in different sites and how it changed during the process.

全能

The Output Legitimacy of the IANA Transition Process,older community. Furthermore, the chapter assesses whether the new arrangements and the bylaw’s modifications made it possible to remedy the well-known limitations of ICANN governance, both in terms of institutional and outcome effectiveness.

ALE

The Input Legitimacy of the IANA Transition Process,making process, as well as to investigate revolving doors, blurring boundaries and hidden power structures among stakeholders. Findings show that the selection and categorization of stakeholders reproduced within the IANA transition process the same misrepresentations and power imbalances already existing in the ICANN governance structure.

鼓掌

Conclusion: The Misleading Rhetoric of Multistakeholderism,ks resulting in misleading rhetoric that legitimizes power asymmetries, rather than being a performative concept leading toward the democratization of transnational policy-making. Finally, the chapter calls for a reform of multistakeholder governance toward a model of digital constitutionalism.