| 书目名称 | Law and Logic | | 副标题 | A Critical Account o | | 编辑 | Joseph Horovitz | | 视频video | | | 丛书名称 | LEP Library of Exact Philosophy | | 图书封面 |  | | 描述 | This book has two related aims: to investigate the frequently voiced claim that legal argument is nonformal in nature and, within the limits of such an investigation, to ascertain the most general proper ties of law as a rational system. Examination of a number of views of legal argument, selected from recent discussions in Germany, Belgium, and the English-speaking countries, will lead to the follow ing main conclusions. The nonformalistic conceptions of the logic of legal argument are ambiguous and unclear. Moreover, insofar as these conceptions are capable of clarification in the light of recent analytical methodology, they can be seen to be either mistaken or else compatible with the formalistic position. Because law is socially directive and coordinative, it is dependent upon theoretical psycho sociology and calls, in principle, for a deontic and inductive logic. The primary function of legal argument is to provide continuing reinterpretation and confirmation of legal rules, conceived as theo retical prescriptions. On the basis of this conception, the old juris prudential conflict between formalism and rule-scepticism appears substantially resolved. Aristotle, the founder | | 出版日期 | Book 1972 | | 关键词 | Hart; Law; Natur; interpretation; legal logic | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7111-0 | | isbn_softcover | 978-3-211-81066-8 | | isbn_ebook | 978-3-7091-7111-0Series ISSN 0075-9104 | | issn_series | 0075-9104 | | copyright | Springer-Verlag/Wien 1972 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
发表于 2025-3-21 17:51:00
