找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Land, Labour and Livelihoods; Indian Women‘s Persp Bina Fernandez,Meena Gopal,Orlanda Ruthven Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

[复制链接]
查看: 49199|回复: 52
发表于 2025-3-21 16:50:54 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Land, Labour and Livelihoods
副标题Indian Women‘s Persp
编辑Bina Fernandez,Meena Gopal,Orlanda Ruthven
视频video
概述Covers empirically diverse case studies.Focuses not only on productive activities that generate income, but also on non-market elements.Examines gendered social relations intersectionally
丛书名称Gender, Development and Social Change
图书封面Titlebook: Land, Labour and Livelihoods; Indian Women‘s Persp Bina Fernandez,Meena Gopal,Orlanda Ruthven Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T
描述..This bookbrings together a unique collection of theoretical and empirical analyses ofwomen’s access to land, labour and livelihoods in contemporary India. Theauthors recognize that gender relations must be viewed intersectionally, alongwith other social relationships such as caste, ethnicity, religion, sexualityand age, in order to inform an integrated analysis of women’s persistentdisadvantage in India. The chapters examine a diverse range of rural and urbanlivelihoods within sectors such as tea plantations, nursing, hair salons, sexwork and waste collection. Documenting the shifts in these sectors in thecontext of economic liberalization, the authors offer insights on the challengesof development interventions as women negotiate shifts in their livelihoodoptions. Written to engage, the contributions to thisbook will be of interest both to the general reader and to academics andpractitioners in development and gender/women’s studies..
出版日期Book 2016
关键词Gender; India; Development Practice; Gujarat; Disposession; Delhi; Land Rights; Inheritance; Assam; Urban Ren
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40865-1
isbn_softcover978-3-319-82204-4
isbn_ebook978-3-319-40865-1Series ISSN 2730-7328 Series E-ISSN 2730-7336
issn_series 2730-7328
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Land, Labour and Livelihoods影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Land, Labour and Livelihoods影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Land, Labour and Livelihoods网络公开度




书目名称Land, Labour and Livelihoods网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Land, Labour and Livelihoods被引频次




书目名称Land, Labour and Livelihoods被引频次学科排名




书目名称Land, Labour and Livelihoods年度引用




书目名称Land, Labour and Livelihoods年度引用学科排名




书目名称Land, Labour and Livelihoods读者反馈




书目名称Land, Labour and Livelihoods读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:49:29 | 显示全部楼层
Land, Labour and Livelihoods978-3-319-40865-1Series ISSN 2730-7328 Series E-ISSN 2730-7336
发表于 2025-3-22 03:47:28 | 显示全部楼层
Bina Fernandez,Meena Gopal,Orlanda RuthvenCovers empirically diverse case studies.Focuses not only on productive activities that generate income, but also on non-market elements.Examines gendered social relations intersectionally
发表于 2025-3-22 06:08:48 | 显示全部楼层
Gender, Development and Social Changehttp://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/580607.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 12:04:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:02:31 | 显示全部楼层
lation, board composition, management, and societal contributions. As this argument still seems to apply, the aim of this chapter is to explore the political nature of corporate foundations (CFs). To meet this aim, this chapter draws out the contours of an emergent social imaginary concerning welfar
发表于 2025-3-22 18:50:52 | 显示全部楼层
Sohnee Harshey,Pratibha Sharma corporate foundations function as well as about the nature of their relationship with the founding company. The foundation literature generally assumes that a foundation’s ability to create social impact and innovation rests to a large part on their independence from external control. However, corp
发表于 2025-3-22 22:23:15 | 显示全部楼层
Dimple Tresa Abraham after World War II. In the early years, corporate philanthropy was purposely detached from business interests, a trend that changed staring in the 1980s. Although there are no regulations targeted specifically toward corporate foundations in the United States, they are subject to regulations as pri
发表于 2025-3-23 02:46:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:49:02 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-24 05:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表