找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning; Lanqin Zheng Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

[复制链接]
查看: 50555|回复: 45
发表于 2025-3-21 19:49:28 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
编辑Lanqin Zheng
视频video
概述Solves open problems in the analysis of knowledge construction from the perspective of information flow.Clarifies the differences between shared knowledge construction and shared regulation.Proposes a
丛书名称Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education
图书封面Titlebook: Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning;  Lanqin Zheng Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T
描述This book proposes and validates an information flow approach to analyzing knowledge co-construction and predicting group performance in the context of collaborative learning. In addition, it highlights the importance of socially shared regulation in collaborative learning, and illustrates in detail how it can be analyzed and promoted..The book investigates several innovative examples, including: Methodological approaches to studying and analyzing knowledge building and regulation in collaborative learning; Social software tools for capturing the dynamics of knowledge building and regulation in collaborative learning; Collective regulatory mechanisms to scaffold socially shared regulation in real-life collaborative learning; and Scripts and interventions to facilitate effective and productive collaborative learning on the basis of several case studies..The original methodological contributions to the analysis of knowledge buildingand scaffolding socially shared regulation make this an essential read for anyone interested in collaborative learning. This book will also be of interest to a wide audience of researchers, teachers, and students in the field of collaborative learning, as
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Co-regulation; Computer-supported Collaborative Learning; Interaction Analysis; Knowledge Construction;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1972-2
isbn_softcover978-981-10-9491-0
isbn_ebook978-981-10-1972-2Series ISSN 2366-1658 Series E-ISSN 2366-1666
issn_series 2366-1658
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapor
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning网络公开度




书目名称Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning被引频次




书目名称Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning被引频次学科排名




书目名称Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning年度引用




书目名称Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning年度引用学科排名




书目名称Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning读者反馈




书目名称Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:13:01 | 显示全部楼层
A Knowledge Map Approach to Analyzing Knowledge Elaboration in Collaborative Learningp performance. A sample of 527 college students voluntarily participated in this study. They were randomly divided into 161 groups of 3 or 4 to conduct collaborative learning. In total, 121 groups conducted face-to-face collaborative learning and 40 groups conducted online collaborative learning. Th
发表于 2025-3-22 04:02:56 | 显示全部楼层
Analyzing Knowledge Convergence in CSCL: An Empirical Studyergence through an innovative analytical method. A total of 192 participants were randomly divided into 48 groups of 4 people. They conducted online collaborative learning for 2 h. The process and outcome of knowledge convergence were analyzed by the knowledge map method in this study. The results i
发表于 2025-3-22 06:21:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:20:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:06:48 | 显示全部楼层
A Socially Shared Regulation Approach to Improving Group Cohesion, Collective Efficacy, and Regulatilearning context is a central issue for researchers. This study sought to develop a CSCL platform with a socially shared regulation mechanism to facilitate group members’ socially shared regulation skills. The empirical study was conducted to validate the proposed approach in a natural learning envi
发表于 2025-3-22 17:17:21 | 显示全部楼层
Promoting Productive Collaborative Learning Using Concept Maps: A Case Studyurse for foreigner graduates. This approach makes use of . as a shared space for facilitating productive collaborative learning in nature learning settings. The result indicated that group members can use . to co-construct knowledge. However, most students only shared and compared information. They
发表于 2025-3-23 00:13:03 | 显示全部楼层
Scripted Collaborative Learning Using the Modified Jigsaw Method: An Empirical Studypace facilitated by .. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the modified jigsaw method. In contrast with the traditional jigsaw method, the modified jigsaw can establish common ground and shared cognition. An experiment was conducted in the lab to evaluate the effects of the
发表于 2025-3-23 01:43:52 | 显示全部楼层
Facilitating Collaborative Learning Through Peer Assessment APP: A Case Studysment is one of the most effective strategies to improve learning performance and higher order thinking skills. Self-efficacy and motivation are two important dimensions of psychology in peer assessment. This study aims to investigate peer assessment, self-efficacy, and motivation as well as the rol
发表于 2025-3-23 05:36:48 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 21:39
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表