找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Key Sociological Thinkers; Rob Stones (Lecturer in Sociology and Director of Textbook 1998Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 199

[复制链接]
查看: 52888|回复: 56
发表于 2025-3-21 19:54:18 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Key Sociological Thinkers
编辑Rob Stones (Lecturer in Sociology and Director of
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/543/542589/542589.mp4
概述‘Star cast‘ of contributors. Each chapter has been written to a strong editorial brief, which gives the book a very structured and coherent feel. Each chapter seeks to draw out the relevance of a part
图书封面Titlebook: Key Sociological Thinkers;  Rob Stones (Lecturer in Sociology and Director of  Textbook 1998Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 199
描述This broad-ranging text offers an exciting and easily understood introduction to the theorists who have made a key contribution to the discipline of sociology.Its carefully formulated structure places the writers in their social and intellectual context, summarises the central issues dealt with in their work and sketches out the intellectual legacy they have left behind them.Graphically illustrating how these thinkers have shed light on how we think about society, the book aims to convey the spirit of openness intrinsic to the sociological enterprise.
出版日期Textbook 1998Latest edition
关键词Emile Durkheim; Karl Marx; Max Weber; Michel Foucault; Pierre Bourdieu; sociology; Talcott Parson; Talcott
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26616-6
copyrightMacmillan Publishers Limited 1998
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Key Sociological Thinkers影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Key Sociological Thinkers影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Key Sociological Thinkers网络公开度




书目名称Key Sociological Thinkers网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Key Sociological Thinkers被引频次




书目名称Key Sociological Thinkers被引频次学科排名




书目名称Key Sociological Thinkers年度引用




书目名称Key Sociological Thinkers年度引用学科排名




书目名称Key Sociological Thinkers读者反馈




书目名称Key Sociological Thinkers读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:47:43 | 显示全部楼层
David Lockwoods issues, but creatively to use basic Marxist concepts and substantive theories in order to (a) show the inadequacy of Parsonian conceptual tools for understanding the constitution, reproduction and transformation of modern societies; and (b) explore empirically the social structure of modern Britain.
发表于 2025-3-22 03:48:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:03:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:44:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:21:29 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction: Society as More Than a Collection of Free-floating Individualshat appear on the panel of . for many of them are clearly bright and articulate, they clearly ‘know their stuff’. But could it, we may ask, have something to do with the ‘kind of stuff they know’? For, quite simply, most of us think about society and social life without having had any schooling in how to think about society and social life.
发表于 2025-3-22 18:22:53 | 显示全部楼层
Talcott Parsonsfaced by the world in which he lived. These included the struggle between capitalism and communism, the advent of Fascism and world war, racial and ethnic conflict, and the lack of a stable global environment for political security.
发表于 2025-3-22 23:53:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:33:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:42:19 | 显示全部楼层
Robert K. Mertonion of Merton’s earlier essays is as close to a Bible as one is likely to come when surveying social theories that provided inspiration and conceptual guidelines for the most fruitful social research undertaken since the Second World War.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-10 22:10
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表