Titlebook: Justice, Rights, and Tort Law; Michael D. Bayles,Bruce Chapman Book 1983 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1983 editing.eth

mediocrity

Putting Fault Back Into Products Liability: A Modest Reconstruction of Tort Theory, legally recognized rights or interests is the sole criterion of liability, the burden of precautions on the agent of the harm being explicitly excluded from consideration..Finally, the rights-based theory is applied to the area of products liability. It is demonstrated that this area of the law of

Polydipsia

Liability for Failing to Rescue,rt liability is to compensate, that there are certain sorts of situations in which compensation is apposite, and that failure to rescue does not fit into these categories. Criminal liability is the appropriate way for the law to recognize a duty to rescue.

MITE

cinder

e with permission. Westminster Institute for Ethics and Human Values, M.D.B. Westminster College, London, Canada B.C. vii INTRODUCTION The law of torts is society‘s primary mechanism for resolving disputes arising from personal injury and property damage.978-94-009-7205-6978-94-009-7203-2

crockery

http://image.papertrans.cn/j/image/501764.jpg

废止

Dawdle

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7203-2editing; ethics; issue; journal; philosophy; project

星球的光亮度

真繁荣

Ethical Issues in the Law of Tort,provide the basis for discussion, namely the theories of compensation, retribution and deterrence. While no one of these three theories can fully explain or justify existing tort law, it is suggested that the deterrence theorist provides the best rationale of the three for the harm requirement and f

GIDDY

Moral Theories of Torts: their Scope and Limits: Part I,his has usually meant trying to rationalize a body of law under one or another principle of justice. This paper explores the efforts of the leading tort theorists to provide a moral basis — in the sense of rational reconstruction based on alleged moral principles — for the law of torts. The paper is