Titlebook: Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective; Kenneth M. Holland (Professor of Political Science Book 1991 Palgrave Macmillan, a division

慢慢啃

Overview: The theme of this book is judicial activism in industrialized democracies, with a chapter on the changing political roles of the courts in the Soviet Union. Eleven contributors describe the extent to which the highest courts in their country of expertise have embraced the making of public policy.978-1-349-11774-1

起皱纹

MODE

Judicial Activism in Italy,policies applaud the independence displayed by judges. The task of clarifying the constitutionally acceptable limits of judicial authority is colored by the political persuasion of the observer and muddled by the different stances assumed by the various types of courts in Italy.

喊叫

Judicial Activism in England,bserve that as a result of a series of judicial decisions since about 1950 … there has been a dramatic and indeed a radical change … That change has been described — by no means critically — as an upsurge of judicial activism.’

tariff

Amenable

Judicial Activism in the United States,nd state appellate and trial courts. The proper role of judicial power in a democracy continues to be one of the most contentious contemporary political issues in the United States at the same time that the activism of its courts is emulated by more and more democratic nations throughout the world.

LURE

Judicial Activism in Canada,d the conservatism of its English role model. Judicial restraint was a dominant feature of court work, with only a few notable exceptions that had no lasting impact on how the judiciary saw itself or saw the world around it.

Ballad

Judicial Activism in Germany,e recognizable political content. With the judges more often promoted to the court for political reasons, than by the bureaucratic standards evident elsewhere in the system, activism can be expected to be especially prevalent.

荣幸

Introduction, affecting thereby many more people and interests than if they had confined themselves to the resolution of narrow disputes. The activism of a court, thus, can be measured by the degree of power that it exercises over citizens, the legislature, and the administration.

AGATE

Judicial Activism in the United States,or. In the 1950s and 1960s, however, the Court boldly undertook a new mission that resulted in judicial policy-making of unprecedented scope and impact. The Court and its controversial policies provoked a political backlash that contributed to five victories for the Republican Party in the next six