找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Judges and Adjudication in Constitutional Democracies: A View from Legal Realism; Pierluigi Chiassoni,Bojan Spaić Book 2021 Springer Natur

[复制链接]
楼主: ARGOT
发表于 2025-3-25 04:39:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 09:14:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 14:10:47 | 显示全部楼层
The Roles of Judges in Democracies: A Realistic View,t democracy demands that we recognize that electoral outcomes are largely, though not entirely, unrelated to concrete policy choices by elected representatives or to the policy preferences of voters, who typically follow their party based on “tribal” loyalties. The latter fact renders irrelevant the
发表于 2025-3-25 17:39:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 21:49:35 | 显示全部楼层
On the (Un)Changing Judge Icons and Their Creators: On Deborah, Coke and Montesquieu, Posner and Ba the role of a judge in the society has remained the same since the dawn of time, or at least the birth of law and state, i.e. from the creation of courts and judges. Or does the role of judge perhaps differ from premodern to modern age? And if it does differ, are those differences negligible or imp
发表于 2025-3-26 03:06:55 | 显示全部楼层
An Exercise in Legal Realism,legal realism and legal positivism; (2) the concept of validity; (3) the theory of interpretation; (4) the ontology of law; (5) the epistemology of legal cognition; (6) the nature of the so-called rule of recognition; (7) the concept of obligation.
发表于 2025-3-26 06:40:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 12:16:20 | 显示全部楼层
Rule(s) of Recognition and Canons of Interpretation,that this, therefore, means that canons of interpretation are also part of these criteria. Such a view then faces the problem of theoretical disagreements that call into question the rule of recognition itself and legal positivistic accounts of law. The paper argues that the rule of recognition sets
发表于 2025-3-26 12:52:08 | 显示全部楼层
Legal Realism and Legal Doctrine, cannot, constrain judges from using existing legal materials to reach virtually any outcome they want. As such, doctrine only serves to hides and obfuscate what is better discussed openly. The purpose of this essay is to complicate this familiar story. I focus on one contemporary take on legal real
发表于 2025-3-26 17:49:00 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-23 10:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表