找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic; Maria van der Schaar Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Bolzano and

[复制链接]
查看: 55575|回复: 45
发表于 2025-3-21 19:50:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic
编辑Maria van der Schaar
视频video
概述The first book to relate the theory of judgment to the epistemic foundation of logic.Uses the history of philosophy to generate solutions to contemporary problems in the foundation of logic.Covers bot
丛书名称Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
图书封面Titlebook: Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic;  Maria van der Schaar Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Bolzano and
描述This compelling reevaluation of the relationship between logic and knowledge affirms the key role that the notion of judgement must play in such a review. The commentary repatriates the concept of judgement in the discussion, banished in recent times by the logical positivism of Wittgenstein, Hilbert and Schlick, and the Platonism of Bolzano. The volume commences with the insights of Swedish philosopher Per Martin-Löf, the father of constructive type theory, for whom logic is a demonstrative science in which judgement is a settled feature of the landscape. His paper opens the first of four sections that examine, in turn, historical philosophical assessments of judgement and reason; their place in early modern philosophy; the notion of judgement and logical theory in Wolff, Kant and Neo-Kantians like Windelband; their development in the Husserlian phenomenological paradigm; and the work of Bolzano, Russell and Frege. The papers, whose authors include Per Martin-Löf, Göran Sundholm, Michael Della Rocca and Robin Rollinger, represent a finely judged editorial selection highlighting work on philosophers exercised by the question of whether or not an epistemic notion of judgement has a
出版日期Book 2013
关键词Bolzano and analytic truth; Bolzano and conceptual truth; Brentano on states of affairs; Conception of
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5137-8
isbn_softcover978-94-007-9587-7
isbn_ebook978-94-007-5137-8Series ISSN 2214-9775 Series E-ISSN 2214-9783
issn_series 2214-9775
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic网络公开度




书目名称Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic被引频次




书目名称Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic被引频次学科排名




书目名称Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic年度引用




书目名称Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic年度引用学科排名




书目名称Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic读者反馈




书目名称Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:01:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:27:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:44:53 | 显示全部楼层
Immanent and Real States of Affairs in Husserl’s Early Theory of Judgement: Reflections on Manuscripejected, are regarded as worthy of attention. The occurrence of this concept in Husserl’s earlier writings, however, has yet to receive attention, mainly because the relevant material has been published only recently in a volume (. XL) which consists of texts on the theory of judgement written as early as 1893 and as late as 1918.
发表于 2025-3-22 10:09:20 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2013iew. The commentary repatriates the concept of judgement in the discussion, banished in recent times by the logical positivism of Wittgenstein, Hilbert and Schlick, and the Platonism of Bolzano. The volume commences with the insights of Swedish philosopher Per Martin-Löf, the father of constructive
发表于 2025-3-22 14:51:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:23:13 | 显示全部楼层
Descartes’ Theory of Judgement: Warranted Assertions, the Key to Scienceand the function of the concept of judgement in the ., a text Descartes is likely to have been working on from 1618 to 1628 and which was not published during his lifetime. ., which belong to the earliest strata of Descartes’ work, constitute the starting point not only of Descartes’ scientific thought but also of his philosophy in general.
发表于 2025-3-23 01:15:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:13:40 | 显示全部楼层
2214-9775 contemporary problems in the foundation of logic.Covers botThis compelling reevaluation of the relationship between logic and knowledge affirms the key role that the notion of judgement must play in such a review. The commentary repatriates the concept of judgement in the discussion, banished in re
发表于 2025-3-23 09:07:01 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 08:37
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表