找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Joseph Conrad and the Reader; Questioning Modern T Amar Acheraïou Book 2009 Amar Acheraïou 2009 aesthetics.Autorschaft.fiction.Narrative.Br

[复制链接]
查看: 55663|回复: 41
发表于 2025-3-21 19:25:27 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Joseph Conrad and the Reader
副标题Questioning Modern T
编辑Amar Acheraïou
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Joseph Conrad and the Reader; Questioning Modern T Amar Acheraïou Book 2009 Amar Acheraïou 2009 aesthetics.Autorschaft.fiction.Narrative.Br
描述Joseph Conrad and the Reader is the first book fully devoted to Conrad‘s relation to the reader, visual theory and authorship. This challenging study proposes new approaches to modern literary criticism and deftly examines the limits of deconstructionist theories, introducing groundbreaking new theoretical concepts of reading and reception.
出版日期Book 2009
关键词aesthetics; Autorschaft; fiction; Narrative; British and Irish Literature
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250833
isbn_softcover978-1-349-30997-9
isbn_ebook978-0-230-25083-3
copyrightAmar Acheraïou 2009
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Joseph Conrad and the Reader影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Joseph Conrad and the Reader影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Joseph Conrad and the Reader网络公开度




书目名称Joseph Conrad and the Reader网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Joseph Conrad and the Reader被引频次




书目名称Joseph Conrad and the Reader被引频次学科排名




书目名称Joseph Conrad and the Reader年度引用




书目名称Joseph Conrad and the Reader年度引用学科排名




书目名称Joseph Conrad and the Reader读者反馈




书目名称Joseph Conrad and the Reader读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:20:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:37:36 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2009Joseph Conrad and the Reader is the first book fully devoted to Conrad‘s relation to the reader, visual theory and authorship. This challenging study proposes new approaches to modern literary criticism and deftly examines the limits of deconstructionist theories, introducing groundbreaking new theoretical concepts of reading and reception.
发表于 2025-3-22 05:01:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:46:14 | 显示全部楼层
Polish Responses: Art and the Ethics of Collectivityn the overlooked cultural, ideological, and political factors that influenced Polish responses to Conrad’s writing. The overall objective is to trace how far the responses of Conrad’s Polish readers were determined by overpowering cultural and ideological constructs that leave little room, if any, for dialogical paradigms.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:10:16 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusionk poet who was inspired by the Muses and keen to entertain and instruct his audience. Rather, the authorial figure that Conrad projects is more in keeping with the Flaubertian type, lurking behind the work and maintaining a detached posture towards the written fictional universe.
发表于 2025-3-22 17:03:22 | 显示全部楼层
A Cartography of Conrad’s Fictional Readers: Reading Hierarchy in ,, ‘Heart of Darkness’, ,, and historical documents and newspapers. The metaphorical, abstract, or rhetorical category of readers is composed of active observers and interpreters of allegorical scripts such as other characters’ faces, their body language, and their geographic, social, and cultural contexts.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:12:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:03:49 | 显示全部楼层
ing study proposes new approaches to modern literary criticism and deftly examines the limits of deconstructionist theories, introducing groundbreaking new theoretical concepts of reading and reception.978-1-349-30997-9978-0-230-25083-3
发表于 2025-3-23 06:16:29 | 显示全部楼层
Conrad’s Conception of Authorship: Probing the Implications and Limits of the Death-of-the-Author Tht in . His tragedies were not only meant to produce strong emotions, such as fear and pity, but were also intended to educate these very emotions and thus contribute to the audience’s moral education — as was expected from every tragedian.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 17:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表