找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Issues in Science and Theology: What is Life?; Dirk Evers,Michael Fuller,Knut-Willy Sæther Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

[复制链接]
楼主: BID
发表于 2025-3-26 21:26:33 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2015iology. It then presents insights on the concept from the perspectives of philosophy, theology, and ethics. The book concludes with chapters on the hermeneutics of Life, and pays special attention to the Biosemiotics approach to the concept. The question ‘What is Life?’ has been deliberated by the g
发表于 2025-3-27 02:14:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 06:55:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 11:29:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 14:52:06 | 显示全部楼层
Reflections on Life: Lessons from Evolutionary Biology, with Insights from Sergius Bulgakovs sense without it: (2) that evolution is tightly linked to another biological science, ecology, and that failure to accept evolution often leads to a failure to accept ecological principles; and (3) that many serious scholars who choose not to accept evolution do so because of false ideas that they
发表于 2025-3-27 19:37:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 22:33:52 | 显示全部楼层
Life: An Ill-Defined Relationshipersial issue. It was sufficient to go by a simple rule: you know it when you see it. Questions like whether viruses are alive or why a brain-dead person is pronounced dead, although her heart works, do not have a long trajectory in the history of understanding life. However, progress in science and
发表于 2025-3-28 04:21:40 | 显示全部楼层
Emergence, Realism and the Good Lifelife”, are considered; Stuart Kauffman and Loyal Rue. The main thesis of this paper is that there is a conflict between naturalism and scientific realism, views which are presupposed by both Rue and Kauffman. I argue that this severely undermines their project of developing a normative naturalism. M
发表于 2025-3-28 08:10:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 12:34:41 | 显示全部楼层
The Openness of Life: Personhood and Faith: An Infinitizer Approachtheir lives with imagination in ways that are essentially exploratory rather than definitively explanatory. Consideration of personhood may be a fruitful dialogue topic, for key aspects of being a person pose real difficulties for science, and faith can add richness to descriptions of personal life.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-7 22:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表