找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth; The Role of Brouwer’ Enrico Martino Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG 2018 Inform

[复制链接]
查看: 35567|回复: 53
发表于 2025-3-21 16:17:54 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth
副标题The Role of Brouwer’
编辑Enrico Martino
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/475/474544/474544.mp4
概述Offers a new analysis of the role of Brouwer’s creative subject.Details realistic aspects of the idealization of the creative subject.Examines the hidden role of acts of choice even in classical logic
丛书名称Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
图书封面Titlebook: Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth; The Role of Brouwer’ Enrico Martino Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG 2018 Inform
描述.This book examines the role of acts of choice in classical and intuitionistic mathematics. Featuring fifteen papers – both new and previously published – it offers a fresh analysis of concepts developed by the mathematician and philosopher L.E.J. Brouwer, the founder of intuitionism..The author explores Brouwer’s idealization of the creative subject as the basis for intuitionistic truth, and in the process he also discusses an important, related question: to what extent does the intuitionistic perspective succeed in avoiding the classical realistic notion of truth? The papers detail realistic aspects in the idealization of the creative subject and investigate the hidden role of choice even in classical logic and mathematics, covering such topics as bar theorem, type theory, inductive evidence, Beth models, fallible models, and more. In addition, the author offers a critical analysis of the response of key mathematicians and philosophers to Brouwer’s work. These figures includeMichael Dummett, Saul Kripke, Per Martin-Löf, and Arend Heyting..This book appeals to researchers and graduate students with an interest in philosophy of mathematics, linguistics, and mathematics..
出版日期Book 2018
关键词Informal Intuitionistic Proof; Creative Subject; Bar Theorem; Type Theory; Constructivism; Inductive Evid
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74357-8
isbn_softcover978-3-030-08971-9
isbn_ebook978-3-319-74357-8Series ISSN 2214-9775 Series E-ISSN 2214-9783
issn_series 2214-9775
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth网络公开度




书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth被引频次




书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth被引频次学科排名




书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth年度引用




书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth年度引用学科排名




书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth读者反馈




书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:04:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:59:52 | 显示全部楼层
Connection Between the Principle of Inductive Evidence and the Bar Theorem,xplaining it properly. Therefore, I shall present here a more adequate treatment of the connection between . and .. In fact, I shall assume acquaintance with Sects. . and Theorem . of CS and provide a revised version of Theorem ..
发表于 2025-3-22 08:25:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:20:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:19:47 | 显示全部楼层
Negationless Intuitionism,or such semantics, strong completeness is restorable. We argue that lawless negationless semantics is a suitable framework for a constructive . interpretation of any second-order formalisable theory (classical or intuitionistic, contradictory or not).
发表于 2025-3-22 18:18:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:06:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:14:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:53:40 | 显示全部楼层
Negationless Intuitionism,mpleteness of full first-order logic fails. We then consider a .à la. for second-order intuitionistic logic. By using the theory of . we prove that, for such semantics, strong completeness is restorable. We argue that lawless negationless semantics is a suitable framework for a constructive . interp
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-4 09:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表