Titlebook: Intoxication, Modernity, and Colonialism; Freud’s Industrial U Dušan I.‘Bjelić Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20

Harness

时间等

Book 2016es of intoxicating discourse. Freud discovered the “libido” and “unconscious” in the industrial mimetic scheme of cocaine, whereas Benjamin found an inspiration for his critique of phantasmagoria and its variant psychoanalysis in hashish’s mimesis. In addition, as part of the history of colonialism,

larder

,Benjamin’s Unconscious Colonialism,iously with a secondary colonialism. Benjamin’s Mexican dreams along with his hashish hallucinations and physiognomic analysis of the urban environment would unpack the traces of Orientalism and colonialism as infrastructural aspects of the colonial metropolis.

Arthr-

mimesis. In addition, as part of the history of colonialism, both drugs generated two distinct colonial discourses and, consequently, two different understandings of the emancipatory powers of pleasure, the unconscious, and dreams. After all, great ideas don‘t liberate; they intoxicate.978-1-349-95721-7978-1-137-58856-2

Interim

外向者

minaret

,Freud’s Cocaine Dreams and Memories, the child and the child’s fantasies. For Benjamin the child at play and the child’s mimetic imagination were hardly pathogenic, but rather offered imaginative resources for rethinking Marxist revolutionary tactics.

咆哮

harbinger

,Freud’s Somatic Paris: The Benjaminian Thesis,chological expressions. Freud’s studies of hysteria with Charcot resulted in Freud’s psychological turn, but he never accounted for the extent to which Paris as a “toxin” influenced his studies of hysteria. He encountered hysteria in the city of collective dreams and of an infrastructural unconscious from which he never woke up.

繁殖