找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation; The Pragmatics of Qu Fabrizio Macagno,Douglas Walton Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2

[复制链接]
查看: 52568|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 19:19:07 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation
副标题The Pragmatics of Qu
编辑Fabrizio Macagno,Douglas Walton
视频video
概述Provides a unique analysis of the uses and the dangerous effects of quotations in political discourse and legal cases.Offers a method and a procedure for evaluating quotes and misquotes.Analyzes quota
丛书名称Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology
图书封面Titlebook: Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation; The Pragmatics of Qu Fabrizio Macagno,Douglas Walton Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2
描述.This book shows how research in linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric can be connected through argumentation to analyze a recognizably common strategy used in political and everyday conversation, namely the distortion of another’s words in an argumentative exchange. Straw man argumentation refers to the modification of a position by misquoting, misreporting or wrenching the original speaker’s statements from their context in order to attack them more easily or more effectively. Through 63 examples taken from different contexts (including political and forensic discourses and dialogs) and 20 legal cases, the book analyzes the explicit and implicit types of straw man, shows how to assess the correctness of a quote or a report, and illustrates the arguments that can be used for supporting an interpretation and defending against a distortion. The tools of argumentation theory, a discipline aimed at investigating the uses of arguments by combining insights from pragmatics, logic, and communication, are applied to provide an original account of interpretation and reporting, and to describe and illustrate tactics and procedures that can be used and implemented for p
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Types of ad hominem; Uses of ambiguity; Interpretation and presumptive reasoning; The burden of misquot
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62545-4
isbn_softcover978-3-319-87337-4
isbn_ebook978-3-319-62545-4Series ISSN 2214-3807 Series E-ISSN 2214-3815
issn_series 2214-3807
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation网络公开度




书目名称Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation被引频次




书目名称Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation被引频次学科排名




书目名称Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation年度引用




书目名称Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation年度引用学科排名




书目名称Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation读者反馈




书目名称Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:13:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:32:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:29:49 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-319-87337-4Springer International Publishing AG 2017
发表于 2025-3-22 09:28:54 | 显示全部楼层
Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation978-3-319-62545-4Series ISSN 2214-3807 Series E-ISSN 2214-3815
发表于 2025-3-22 13:11:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:15:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:40:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:01:48 | 显示全部楼层
The Strategies of Misattribution of Commitments,ed version of the other’s viewpoint or commitments, in order to rebut his argument more easily by attacking a position that has been simplified and weakened. This strategy, however, can lead to the risk of being accused of breaching the rules of the discussion by distorting the other’s ideas. This r
发表于 2025-3-23 08:35:21 | 显示全部楼层
Evaluating Relevance and Commitments in Rhetorical Straw Man, the notion of argumentative relevance for assessing when a viewpoint is correctly reported or manipulated. We will describe relevance as a sequential concept referring to the number of premises and intermediate arguments to connect a move (the interpretation of a move in this case) to the issue or
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 05:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表