Titlebook: Interpreting Plato Socratically; Socrates and Justice J. Angelo Corlett Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Na

认识

玛瑙

Interpreting Plato Socratically,es. It then provides in-depth criticisms of the Mouthpiece Interpretation of Plato’s dialogues, exposing various logical errors employed by its supporters. It also seeks to differentiate the Socratic Anti-Mouthpiece Interpretation from other anti-mouthpiece approaches, clarifying that while some obj

不能仁慈

,Defending the Socratic Interpretation of Plato’s Dialogues, Interpretation of Plato’s dialogues. It is the goal of this chapter to defend the Socratic Anti-Mouthpiece Interpretation as the most plausible approach to Plato’s dialogues because it is the least problematic and because there are no discernible objections to it that render it implausible. This ch

芳香一点

In Defense of Socratic Studies, Socrates or Plato’s Socrates any proposition of philosophical substance found in Plato’s dialogues. It discusses the Socratic Question largely in the context of the discussion found in Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith, .. In the end, it is argued that just as many philosophers commit them

担心

Socrates and Distributive Justice,onstrate how the Socratic Anti-Mouthpiece Interpretation can and ought to function when it interprets the words placed in Socrates’ mouth by Plato. One of the leading contemporary philosophers of Plato, Richard Kraut, argues that Plato has a theory of distributive justice. However, while this chapte

格言

,Legal Obligation in Plato’s ,,meaning of Socrates’ words. For Socrates, he has no moral obligation to obey the laws of Athens in that he has been unjustly convicted of atheism and corruption of (some of) the Athenian youth by teaching some of them philosophy. Since he was not an atheist and since he had not genuinely corrupted t

改变

The Socratic Roots of Retributivism,chapter examines and exposes this view to be incorrect and poorly established by way of the informational contents of the Platonic corpus. Given the plausibility of the Socratic (Anti-Mouthpiece) Interpretation, what the Platonic corpus tells us is nothing at all about Plato’s theory of punishment.

被告

Socrates and Compensatory Justice,hapter sets forth what Plato’s Socrates says about compensatory justice, and it would appear that what Socrates articulates is rather generally consistent with contemporary U.S. law on the matter. Virtue ethicists seemed to have ignored such facts present in the Platonic corpus.

忙碌

Book 2018, love, virtue, knowledge, and the like because, they believe, Socrates is Plato’s mouthpiece through the dialogues. But is such an approach justified? What are the arguments in favor of such an approach? Is there a viable alternative approach to Plato’s dialogues?.In this rigorous account of the do

动作谜

ece through the dialogues. But is such an approach justified? What are the arguments in favor of such an approach? Is there a viable alternative approach to Plato’s dialogues?.In this rigorous account of the do978-3-030-17105-6978-3-319-77320-9