Titlebook: Interpretation without Truth; A Realistic Enquiry Pierluigi Chiassoni Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Analytical Scepticism.A

JOLT

书目名称Interpretation without Truth影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Interpretation without Truth影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Interpretation without Truth网络公开度




书目名称Interpretation without Truth网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Interpretation without Truth被引频次




书目名称Interpretation without Truth被引频次学科排名




书目名称Interpretation without Truth年度引用




书目名称Interpretation without Truth年度引用学科排名




书目名称Interpretation without Truth读者反馈




书目名称Interpretation without Truth读者反馈学科排名

调整

Interpretation, Truth, and the Logical Forms of Interpretive Discourse,e find in interpretive discourse? By providing an answer to these questions, the chapter purports to set the stage for the whole book. In carrying out an enquiry concerning the connections between legal interpretation and truth, it outlines a realistic conceptual apparatus, which aims at capturing (

虚弱的神经

Interpretive Games, prize. The chapter purports to provide a first line of argument in favour of a construction conception, by arguing against a couple of theories of legal interpretation—the “word-meaning theory” and the “sentence-meaning theory”—worked out by influential legal theorists with an eye to the philosophy

Narrative

死亡率

Frames v. Containers,antage point. It considers and compares two competing theories concerning the notions of legal interpretation and of general norms of written-law. These are the frame of interpretations theory and the container-retrieval theory—the latter, as we shall see, in a conventional linguistic meaning variet

Fibrinogen

Towards Pragmatic Realism,. It presents a five-steps argument. The first step lays down a conceptual framework. The second step provides a revisited account of three theories of legal interpretation—realism (non-cognitivism) and two varieties of formalism (integral and limited cognitivism)—putting forth a few criticisms of t

Ligament

极为愤怒

Precedent,n of .; (b) the interpretation of precedents; (c) the practical relevance of precedents. Dealing with the first issue, three notions of . are proposed by way of a rational reconstruction of on-going concepts. Dealing with the second issue, the whole set of common law techniques for coping with prece

后天习得

Defeasibility and Legal Indeterminacy,her hot spot, legal indeterminacy. Considering linguistic therapy the lot of useful philosophical enquiry, it proceeds to the analysis of the “structure” of philosophical thought on the matter, proposing a rational reconstruction thereof. The ultimate goal is contributing to the laying down of a sou

火光在摇曳